It`s hard to make the short-term ROI case on a hybrid, but it`s really no different than trying to make the case for a higher efficiency furnace or a high SEER air conditioner (or an LED light bulb). I don`t agree about the hydrogen economy--the infrastructure will be too hard to build out and there is too much competition (from other alternate fuels). The beauty of hybrids, plug in hybrids, and perhaps EV`s is they use the existing gasoline and electric infrastructures.
As far as your comments about the hybrids having substandard trim/options, I think a lot of that is market-driven--because the target for hybrids is "planet savers", the hybrid portion is taken to an extreme in an attempt to differentiate it from a "normal" (non planet-saving) car. I think some of the luxury examples (Lexus, Lincoln MKZ) are more balanced (in fact IIRC the MKZ had no premium for the hybrid version).
The other thing I can`t agree with is that hybrids are about "batteries"; they`re not--they are about recovery of braking energy. It`s not a new idea, it came up during the `73 embargo, the idea then was flywheels (back when batteries and electronics were not so sophisticated). Flywheels - Scientific American
It`s probably a moot point, we`re going to see cars becoming more efficient, and I don`t see a loss of performance when you see things like small turbocharged engines and dual-clutch automatics coming down the pike.
My new water heater is a hybrid, Heat pump with standard electric heat for certain situations
only a two seater and still considered a m/c in most places, but gets a claimed 84mpg- https://www.startengine.com/startup/elio-motors
I`m lucky if my Harley gets 36mpg on the highway.
Formerly the "Best Detailer", now just Super Wax Waster Man. Not necessarily tactful, but normally right. It`s good to be da King !!!Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 Dislikestropicsteve liked this post
ahh yes, snow birds.
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 DislikesRonkh liked this post
My Grandparents immigrated from Denmark to the States in the 50`s
If you lived in Denmark right now you would, on average, make 30% less and pay Personal Income Tax of 61%
As long as somebody else is paying for it...it is always a brilliant idea
Denmark Personal Income Tax Rate | 1995-2015 | Data | Chart | Calendar
https://m.facebook.com/detailedbykyle?_rdrPost Thanks / Like - 1 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 Dislikes4u2nvinmtl liked this post
I typed, "so you can claim you are saving the planet"
If you want to do something that is good for the environment; great, but the rest of us should not be forced to support your decision with our tax dollars
Your analogy of the 70s makes no sense in relation to my previous comment
https://m.facebook.com/detailedbykyle?_rdrPost Thanks / Like - 2 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 DislikesSwanicyouth, Oldfordisbetter liked this post
In comparing 2015 the rates are 55% compared to 39.6% for the U.S. While it costs more, is money what really matters when comparing quality of life? Now that comes down to personal beliefs and the emphasis a specific person places on taking care of others but look at any quality of life survey and see how countries such as Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Australia, and such place compared to the U.S. Kind of makes you wonder if emphasis on money is overemphasized when your people aren`t happy or over-worked or burnt out by 30.
Where did you get the 2015 number for Denmark?
Where did you get the average personal tax rate for the US (39.6%)?
It appears that you compared the average paid in Denmark versus the top Federal Bracket in the USA; not the average. Did you do that on purpose to confuse the reader or do you not understand the difference?
You will immediately notice that all of the countries have a xxxxgenous population currently
Burned out by 30? What a Baby. Complaining is frowned upon in Scandinavian countries and epidemic in some segments of the population in the USA
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks