Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Northern Nevada
    Posts
    36
    Post Thanks / Like
    Just got done doing my first detail with HD Speed, on a 2011 Toyota Rav4 (owned for 6 months by my parents); and am quite pleased with the results. In the short time the vehicle has been owned, it`s been washed semi-regularly (1-2 times a month, not using best practices), and waxed once or twice with Meg`s UQW. The paint wasn`t in bad shape, even with the lack of non-marring wash techniques, and lack of protection. Micro-marring was very minor, to non-existent; though it had been through a bad sandstorm shortly after being purchased, which left the front end with a lot of stone chip damage. I wasn`t expecting to fix the stone chips, as they had gone completely through the clearcoat and paint, but I was hoping to minimize the look of them as much as possible, as well as smooth them out some. HD Speed didn`t do much to them at all, however it cleaned up the marring/hazing from the compound I used on the chips very well. I want to note that I used the product by hand, with a white CCS foam hand applicator; results are based off this.



    Positives:

    - Smell- smelled a bit like grape soda/jelly. Not enough to make me want to eat it, but enough that it was pleasant to work with for a period of time.

    - Ease of application- a small amount of product covered a decent amount of paint. I felt that it worked well, even by hand.

    - Working Time- I don`t have a lot of experience with other products to compare, but the working time on this seemed quite long, I never had any of it dry up on me, no matter how long I left it before buffing off.

    - Ease of buffing- Much easier than most other products I`ve used; polishes, compounds, paint cleaners or waxes/sealants. I buffed it off with a MF towel, using nothing to aid in the buffing (no QD, water, etc.). It never dried up on me, so I`m not sure how hard it would`ve been to buff off had it dried, but I doubt it would have been too much more difficult.

    - Finished looks- I`m very happy with the finished result. The paint had good depth, shine, and the flake popped even more. It also left a moderate wet look to the paint.

    - Trim- It seemed non-staining on trim. I didn`t let it sit for too long, but it wiped off easily with no residue/discoloration on any trim pieces.



    Negatives:

    - I only had 1 minor negative thing to say, and that is how thick the product is. It`s not a bad thing on it`s own, and it had a lot to do with how far it spread as well as it`s working time. The downside was getting it out of the bottle (so maybe this is actually a negative against the bottle and not the product? Not quite sure). Sometimes getting the product out of the bottle took a bit more effort than I think it should have (even after a few good shakes, it would occasionally fight me).



    Jury is out:

    - Cutting/Correction- I didn`t expect miracles here, since it is an AIO, and I was only using a white pad by hand. That said, it did well in removing some micro-marring and the occasional light scuff. This is the one aspect that using it via machine would likely have improved quite a bit. Until I get a chance to test it with a machine, I don`t want to give a definitive answer on this.

    - Durability- This will take some time to really test. My parents are taking the vehicle for a week long vacation starting tomorrow (going through different types of climates, and landscapes, so it should be a semi-diverse test). I will be able to gauge durability, how well it releases dirt, etc. a little better when they get back.



    Some before and after pictures (the befores are taken just after we finished washing it; for the afters I clayed and took HD Speed to all paint surfaces):



    Full vehicle shots- Before







    Full vehicle shots- After







    Passenger Side door where there is a defect, though not sure from what: it has been improved a bit, and the flake pop around it really helps it disappear even more.

    Before-







    After-







    Couple things on the Driver side rear quarter panel, and bumper. The one on the bumper looks to have polished out, the one on the RQP is a clean slice, clear through the paint (thus not removable), though it is a little less rough around the edges now.

    Before-







    After-



    ---------------------

    Ah...so many pedestrians, so little time...

    - Robin Williams

  2. #2
    Forza Auto Salon David Fermani's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Troy, MI
    Posts
    12,534
    Post Thanks / Like
    Great review. Glad to know that it works well by hand too. Keep us updated on durabilty.
    Metro Detroit`s leader in cleaning, preserving & perfecting fine automobiles!

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. HD Speed Review
    By House of Wax in forum Detailing Product Reviews
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-10-2014, 09:34 AM
  2. HD Speed Review
    By jas11151990 in forum 3D / High Definition Car Care
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-04-2013, 03:13 PM
  3. PRODUCT REVIEW: HD Speed and RWWB
    By pwaug in forum 3D / High Definition Car Care
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-25-2012, 09:48 PM
  4. Review: HD UNO, HD Speed
    By imported_RZJZA80 in forum 3D / High Definition Car Care
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 06-01-2012, 02:25 PM
  5. Product Review: HD Speed and HD Advance Polish
    By darkonion in forum Detailing Product Reviews
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-29-2012, 11:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •