Originally Posted by
bob m
Ridiculous statement. Tell me the product he "reviewed" that wasn`t up to snuff? Well, maybe Beadmaker...
This isn`t as it was years ago, when (by comparison) there were relatively few products and some not all that good. With today`s technology - especially coatings and so many companies releasing new products there are no shortage of excellent products out there for review today. Strings attached? I wonder what those companies think when he does his yearly top detailing awards and their product/products don`t make the list, or (as he is currently doing) fail in the longevity test. A few years ago, he detailed his BMW with CQUARTZ UK 3.0 and now I see he`s done a new video on his new supercar ride - a Porsche 911 Turbo and uses a pro grade ceramic/graphene coating - Roar. I guess those strings aren`t attached too tightly.
I don`t have an issue with anyone getting paid for a review as long as they are upfront about it and they present the product/products honestly - not making any false claims. Others think differently about that. Fine, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. My problem with this drama is that emails regarding a business proposition were made public in order to embarrass the other party. That simply isn`t ok in my book. At this point, I don`t think anyone`s mind is going to be changed one way or the other and I have already posted too much/repeating myself, so I`m going to step aside and leave this thread alone.....
Bookmarks