Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    71
    Post Thanks / Like
    Is the only difference between the two the amount of cut? It looks like #80 is more abrasive. I dont see much discussion on here about the #3 machine glaze and I purchased the #3 after ordering my PC and before reading all of the posts about speed glaze. I wanted to use the #3 after DACP but it seems like I would be better off with the speed glaze instead. Also, is the machine glaze meant to be applied by rotary only? Your thoughts please.
    It`s better to be dead and cool, than alive and uncool.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,560
    Post Thanks / Like
    Machine glaze if I remember the label correctly has a cut of like 1 where as #80 has a cut of 4 on the megs chart. You might need something with a cut to it after DACP just for the fact that hazing may occur and the #3 will probably cover it up if nothing more. You can in fact use the PC to apply #3, it works very well.



    I would suggest if you had to choose between the two to pick up speed glaze.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    86,984
    Post Thanks / Like
    Yeah, #3 (and #5, #7, and #81) is a "pure polish" in Meguiar`s-speak; they`re *functionally* nonabrasive on automotive paint. #80 has a bit of cut and breaks down into something very much like the aforementioned products.



    Use #80 after the #83, it`s a time tested combo. You could then try the #3 over the #80 and see if you get a little more depth and/or gloss.



    You can apply #80 and #3 by hand or PC, or even by rotary, but almost everybody just uses these products by hand or PC.

  4. #4
    atticdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Somerset, Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,428
    Post Thanks / Like
    what about #80 then #81 ?

    how does 81 compare to 3?

    ive read that 81 is like a user friendly 7
    2001 Suzuki Hayabusa GSX1300R
    2003 Toyota echo (45mpg)
    2005 Scion TC

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,565
    Post Thanks / Like
    80 to 81 should look good. The 81 will add more depth and wetness. I tend to use VM or RMG now though.



    81 is more user friendly than the 7 to remove, both produce apperances alike. I believe the 81 is formulated more towards modern clearcoats.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    3,447
    Post Thanks / Like
    Both #3 and #81 are more user-friendly than #7.



    The difference is that #81 is good for hand application and #3 is optimized for machine application - hence the name.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    86,984
    Post Thanks / Like
    Yeah, there are only minor differences between the Meg`s "pure polishes". Even the step #2 of the Deep Crystal system is basically the same stuff. The most user-friendly of them all (IMO) is the #5 New Car Glaze. All but #7 are pretty easy to use and I only use #7 on single stage (and only *very* rarely at that).

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,277
    Post Thanks / Like
    77





























    Sorry, couldn`t resist :spot

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Megs Gold Class vs. Megs NXT Gen. Vehicle Wash Shampoo
    By CumminsCrazed in forum Motorcycle, Marine & RV Detailing
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-16-2009, 07:26 AM
  2. Difference between Megs #4 and #83 also 3M product question.
    By inov8ter in forum Car Detailing Product Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-16-2007, 08:17 PM
  3. What id the difference between Megs #3 & #7?
    By imported_DetailGirl in forum Car Detailing Product Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-22-2005, 10:08 AM
  4. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-17-2005, 04:40 PM
  5. megs #1, 2 & 9 - difference?
    By aheyn in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-19-2004, 08:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •