Forget Graphene...

[Coatings=crack]

Yeah but just because graphene is added to market a product does not mean it is a bad product. Infact a lot of great products have graphene in them.

Agreed the graphene is not adding to the performance.

Same can be said about a lot of Sio2 sealants. The polymers and polysiloxane and what not are the performers. Sio2 just to add some pizzazz.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[PNWSam]

Yeah but just because graphene is added to market a product does not mean it is a bad product. Infact a lot of great products have graphene in them.

Agreed the graphene is not adding to the performance.

Same can be said about a lot of Sio2 sealants. The polymers and polysiloxane and what not are the performers. Sio2 just to add some pizzazz.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I get that and agree, but mixing some graphene powder doesn’t contribute to any benefit and the changes they do advertise are due to different formulations of ceramic base itself. Some coatings do actually have ceramic nanoparticles but agreed the word ceramic has become synonymous with anything that beads water. The problem is with dishonest marketing and as a professional I have to stand for my morals and principles.

I respect brands a lot more who don’t rely on trendy buzzwords to market their product and rely on their performance and let the market decide if it`s worth it. This is why I have massive love and respect for the brands like CarPro, Gyeon, Feynlab, Optimum and Gtechniq, some of whom have openly questioned the value of graphene and haven’t jumped on the trendy #MeToo train.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Dan]

I imagine most makers of graphene coatings wouldn’t appreciate being paid with fake money even if they could probably pawn it off on the next guy. So let’s stop with the fake marketing.

All of this is just a repeat of the teflon sham.