Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    derek37's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,187
    Post Thanks / Like
    Hey y`all, been searching but can`t seem to find an answer.....is the MF compound pad the same as the mf polishing pad? What really is the difference, other than the foam, between the two? I have the Megs mf finishing/polishing pad and if I need to do some heavy correcting, I use the surbuf, which is awesome. I have no problems and really like the mf finishing pads but wondering if the mf compounding pad is really necessary for correction. Are the fibers different on the cutting pad? Will I get the same results (all things being equal) using a compound with the finishing as I would with using the MF compounding pad. I`ve been using UNO v3, killer product, every thing works out well



    Basically, just what is the difference between each pad.



    Derek

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    611
    Post Thanks / Like
    I am not sure if the microfiber is different, meguiars says its different I believe... the difference is the foam interface thickness, which is less on the cutting disc. This translates into less accessory motion between the pores in that interface and which directly translates into better conversion of oscillatory motion for the "cutting" action. Otherwise the foam firmness is slightly more on the cutting disc which again is that direct translation of energy.
    ...they call me Mike



    Dig what we are doing? - Please join us on Facebook and Twitter



    Auto Aesthetica - Detail supply without the fluff

    and WNY`s Premier Automotive Detailing & Finish Restoration Specialists

  3. #3
    derek37's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,187
    Post Thanks / Like
    Wow Mike, if that is true about the fibers being the same, what you say totally makes sense. Great post.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    611
    Post Thanks / Like
    Sorry I corrected myself, regardless though, we are a Megs distributor, and using these pads weekly, I will openly sub a finishing disc if I run out of clean cutting discs.



    But like I said, and hopefully it makes sense, the real difference comes from that direction of polishing movement directly back into the paint.
    ...they call me Mike



    Dig what we are doing? - Please join us on Facebook and Twitter



    Auto Aesthetica - Detail supply without the fluff

    and WNY`s Premier Automotive Detailing & Finish Restoration Specialists

  5. #5
    derek37's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,187
    Post Thanks / Like
    .....right, achieved by the density, or lack there of, of the foam interface. Is the recommended speed the same for both pads?

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    611
    Post Thanks / Like
    Generally I think its a hair lower for the finishing pads. A lot I think depends on where you are in the polishing process, the product you are using and how much removed material is in the pad.



    I personally use the same speed(4-5 DA depending), same pressure for both with slight variations depending on the paint system I am working on. For example on softer paints, I have always tended to keep a moderate pressure, because I felt like(and often would see) if I lightened up, it would score and haze the daylights out of the surface(which you can imagine what it would look like if you had removed material in the pad along with it).



    My DA technique over the years has gone from a pyramid progression, to basically constant pressure, varying the speed if needed to get the paint to respond.



    LangMan what kinds of paints do you typically see?
    ...they call me Mike



    Dig what we are doing? - Please join us on Facebook and Twitter



    Auto Aesthetica - Detail supply without the fluff

    and WNY`s Premier Automotive Detailing & Finish Restoration Specialists

  7. #7
    derek37's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,187
    Post Thanks / Like
    man, i just typed out a long reply and something screwed on my laptop and everything was deleted. That effing pisses me off. I`ll try again tomorrow. Dammit.

  8. #8
    Rasky's Auto Detailing RaskyR1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Eden Prairie, MN
    Posts
    5,011
    Post Thanks / Like
    The MF itself is different between the cutting and finishing pads. If I remember correctly it was fiber length and the MF blend as well. The foam is probably going to be the biggest factor though IMO.

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Optimum MF Cutting and Polishing Pads now available--
    By pwaug in forum Car Detailing Product Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-07-2012, 01:07 PM
  2. your favorite polishing/cutting pads
    By tommyortom in forum Machine Polishing & Sanding
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-25-2006, 11:07 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-26-2004, 06:20 PM
  4. Cutting Pad vs Polishing Pad
    By MaineMDX in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-19-2004, 09:21 AM
  5. Get an extra Cutting pad or Polishing pad?
    By imported_jaobrien6 in forum Car Detailing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-21-2003, 01:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •