SSR2.5 is somewhat equal to DACP # 83 ?
If SSR2.5 is used SSR1 can be used to clean up any minor marring and SSR2 isn`t really needed ?
SSR2.5 basically can take the place of SSR2 since SSR2.5 has diminishing abrasives like DACP ?
Thanks
SSR2.5 is somewhat equal to DACP # 83 ?
If SSR2.5 is used SSR1 can be used to clean up any minor marring and SSR2 isn`t really needed ?
SSR2.5 basically can take the place of SSR2 since SSR2.5 has diminishing abrasives like DACP ?
Thanks
you`re right !!
after 2.5 don`t automatically go for ssr1 . Check your finish first . 2.5 is soo good you might be able to go right to wax/sealant. I haven`t found any marring from using 2.5 w/cutting pad w/PC.
04 Honda Element-Mobile Detailing
02 BMW 325Ci Tit. Slvr. Sprt,Prem.
05 Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R Red Magma
I find that SSR2.5 is similar in cutting ability to DACP, but SSR2.5 breaks down more easily and is less prone to inducing micromarring. I don`t think it is really a substitute for SSR2. There are situations where SSR2 would be the better choice. If you are looking to hold down product costs, then I would say that the SSR2.5/SSR1 combo would be more useful than let`s say a SSR2.5/SSR2 or SSR2/SSR1 combo. Ideally, you`d want to have SSR2.5/SSR2/SSR1 on hand for best results.
SSR2.5 :drunk . Hale-Luja
Cory
1993 Black Camaro Z28
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks