imported_Axe
04-21-2005, 05:32 PM
Hi everyone,
Pretty hefty subject don`t you think? :) OK here it is, I was about to reply to somebodyâ€â„¢s thread relating to removing swirls from a 7 series Beemer. When constructing my reply I realised I was making a statement that I would like your opinions on, so I created this thread. It might prove to be a little controversial but hey :)
I find that spider webbing / swirl marks on *most* vehicles almost impossible to remove completely (Sunshine test) - I have tried DACP IP IzPP Sonus FX1 and many other and some stronger products; using a PC they simply do not touch spider webbing / swirl marks.
I don`t know but, I think a lot of the time people get a tad carried away with their `results`. When pressed, most people will admit that in fact the swirls aren`t totally gone (meaning they haven`t really gone at all) and they are being `slightly` over ambitious in what they perceive as their results. For example itâ€â„¢s amazing how many times the `after` picture is never under the same light or the same angle - even though the job may be done in a garage with lights. (It`s rather difficult to get the same shot outside)
This can make swirl removal a frustrating business with a PC (or Cyclo come to that) because so and so said they got all their swirls out using the PC and IP etc, as you tend to think why canâ€â„¢t I?
I am fast becoming a believer that these DA type tools are not good enough for paint correction (Swirl / spider web removal) on `most` vehicles (I am sure that some vehicles/manufacturers will have soft enough paint that paint correction is possible with a DA). I think the only real swirl removal solution, which I would be loathed/afraid/unskilled to do, is go with a rotary and IP or DACP as I am sure that the heat generated by these devices is what really matters in paint correction.
Because this thread was based on a reply to someone else`s thread, it was refreshing to see someone actually posting saying that SSR2.5 (or whatever) and their PC could not remove swirls, it made me realise that perhaps I am not alone with these thoughts and frustrations; I await your informed opinions and discussion :)
EDIT: Just realised this might be more appropriate in the `Machine Polishing` forum, even though I am discussing the use of products also, MODS please move if you feel it necessary, thanks.
Pretty hefty subject don`t you think? :) OK here it is, I was about to reply to somebodyâ€â„¢s thread relating to removing swirls from a 7 series Beemer. When constructing my reply I realised I was making a statement that I would like your opinions on, so I created this thread. It might prove to be a little controversial but hey :)
I find that spider webbing / swirl marks on *most* vehicles almost impossible to remove completely (Sunshine test) - I have tried DACP IP IzPP Sonus FX1 and many other and some stronger products; using a PC they simply do not touch spider webbing / swirl marks.
I don`t know but, I think a lot of the time people get a tad carried away with their `results`. When pressed, most people will admit that in fact the swirls aren`t totally gone (meaning they haven`t really gone at all) and they are being `slightly` over ambitious in what they perceive as their results. For example itâ€â„¢s amazing how many times the `after` picture is never under the same light or the same angle - even though the job may be done in a garage with lights. (It`s rather difficult to get the same shot outside)
This can make swirl removal a frustrating business with a PC (or Cyclo come to that) because so and so said they got all their swirls out using the PC and IP etc, as you tend to think why canâ€â„¢t I?
I am fast becoming a believer that these DA type tools are not good enough for paint correction (Swirl / spider web removal) on `most` vehicles (I am sure that some vehicles/manufacturers will have soft enough paint that paint correction is possible with a DA). I think the only real swirl removal solution, which I would be loathed/afraid/unskilled to do, is go with a rotary and IP or DACP as I am sure that the heat generated by these devices is what really matters in paint correction.
Because this thread was based on a reply to someone else`s thread, it was refreshing to see someone actually posting saying that SSR2.5 (or whatever) and their PC could not remove swirls, it made me realise that perhaps I am not alone with these thoughts and frustrations; I await your informed opinions and discussion :)
EDIT: Just realised this might be more appropriate in the `Machine Polishing` forum, even though I am discussing the use of products also, MODS please move if you feel it necessary, thanks.