#80 or #82 after DACP?

[TurboDave18T]

For application by PC, which would be a better followup polish after DACP, #80 or #82? I want the extra shine of #80, but is it too close in abrasiveness to DACP?



I`m a little worried about that #80 is too abrasive to follow up after DACP, is this a valid concern? Any comments?



Thanks:up

[ACURA95]

Dave,

Its really funny that you asked that question. I just got a bottle of #80 and was wondering the same exact thing. I also just posted a thread in meguiars.

[TurboDave18T]

Some good info being posted in your thread.:up I`m awaiting Mike`s response before making a final decision

[imported_edschwab1]

#80 works well as a follow-up to DACP. You you should have ready wax surface after using #80, but could follow #80 with #82 or #81 if you wanted. Try both #80 and #82 on different spots after #83 DACP and see what you like best.



Another options is to try using #80 with different pads to see if this works before moving up to DACP. #80 is versatile and works great independent of other abrasives.



Eric

[6318]

I agree with Eric...IIRC #80 is more of a chemical cleaner than abrasive...