PDA

View Full Version : DACP Disappointment



Pages : [1] 2

larry_bar56
06-05-2003, 09:13 AM
Well, I finally got the chance to use my new PC. My white car has a fair amount of light scratching, probably caused by poor washing and harsh winter here in New England. But, all in all, the car still has a decent shine and the scratches don`t seem worse than anything I`ve read about here.



After much reading, it looked like DACP was the right product for this job. I used the PC with a CMA yellow pad. Followed all the guidelines, multiple passes over the area until the DACP disappears, start at speed setting 4 then move to 5 for the final passes. After finishing I was unimpressed with the DACP. I really thought this was going to help. What I got was a bit more shine than I had, but almost no improvement on the scratches.



I know someone will suggest that I should try FCRC, and I will do that, but I just don`t have the time now to do the car over again right now.



I guess the DACP isn`t as abrasive as I thought it would be.



Anyone else have a similar experience and move to something more aggressive and get good results?



Where do I go from here to get the best finish I can get? I was thinking:

SMR with white pad

PI-III Finishing Glaze with gray pad

OG Blitz Wax



Comments?



Thanks

unclearty
06-05-2003, 09:21 AM
I`d suggest Perfect It III Machine glaze with a yellow pad to start. Make sure to mist the pad first with a little water...start out at 3 to 3.5...you should see the product staying liquid a little longer. When you begin to see it turning glossy under the edge of the pad, raise the speed to about 4.5 to 5...work it slowly and the swirls should be pretty musch gone and the gloss should be amazing. NOTE...I am using a white pad..I found that the yellow created a hazing effect...with the white pad..perfection.

Then , when you`re happy with the finish, go over it with a clean white pad and some Vanilla Moose ....oooooh baby!



"I`ll be right in honey..I`m almost done!"

imported_Greg
06-05-2003, 09:21 AM
Wow, I kind of use DACP as my work horse for swirl removers. It pretty much tackles almost any of the swirls I want to get. Sorry you didn`t feel that it did much, especially since swirls are so hard to see on a white car anyway. I might try some fine cut cleaner or Poorboy`s SSR3.

Tim Lingor
06-05-2003, 09:26 AM
Sorry to hear that you are having problems with DACP!!



Here is a link to a thread where someone had similar problems:



http://www.autopia.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=23396&perpage=18&pagenumber=2



I hope this helps a little!!:up

larry_bar56
06-05-2003, 09:29 AM
Is there a difference between the PI-III Machine Glaze and the PI-III Finishing Glaze? I haven`t used the finishing glaze yet and could still exchange it.

Thomasfl
06-05-2003, 09:56 AM
I don`t think he had problems, DACP removes swirls and light scratches but not all scratches. Go with the fine cut cleaner and then DACP. Also when working DACP on a damaged surface crank it up, I leave it on 5 to 5.5 when needed.

endus
06-05-2003, 10:20 AM
What do you mean by "scratches". Swirls and scratches that don`t penetrate the paint can be buffed out, but if you can feel it with your fingernail the best you can do is reduce the appearance of them.



Just be glad you ahve a white car! :)

larry_bar56
06-05-2003, 10:34 AM
The scratches I see are faint and really can`t be felt, so that`s why I thought that I should have had better results. You`re right it is a blessing to have a white car with this type of problem. I can`t imagine how much time some of the dark car owners must put in to keep them looking perfect.

Tim Lingor
06-05-2003, 10:49 AM
Have you looked at the link to the thread I provided yet? The person had similar issues with DACP.



If DACP is not strong enough, you could use Meg`s Compound Cleaner with buffered abrasives. Then DACP followed by SFP.



My other question, are the marks buffer marks? (ie. from a rotary?)



In my opinion, PI-III MG is not as abrassive as DACP. I have and used them both quite often, so I would follow the DACP with the PI-III MG.

Mike_Phillips
06-05-2003, 10:56 AM
Hi Larry,



One question and a couple of thoughts,



Question: Does your paint have a clear coated? I know the majority of cars being painted today have clear coats, but I don`t know if that always holds true for white.



Here is why.



White single stage paints are the hardest paints there are.



You couldn`t pay me enough money to detail a single stage white car with paint problems.



When it comes to "Single Stage Paints", hardness is determined by "Pigment Type". The pigment used to make paint white is "Titanium Dioxide Powder", on the Mohs hardness scale it`s a 9.5.



A Diamond is a 10



Been there... done that... don`t like working on single stage white paint.



Now if it`s a basecoat clearcoat finish, with clear over the white, then your still talking about some pretty hard paint, at least compared to conventional lacquers and enamels from the pre-mid 70`s days.



There is a lot of confusion over the "hardness" of paints. Most people think modern clear coats are "soft", because they scratch so easy. For the most part, this is wrong. Modern clear coats are "Hard", but... they still scratch easy. That`s the irony of it all.



Think about it, have you ever heard of a "Hand Rubbed Lacquer Finish"?



(yes?)



Now... have you ever heard of a "Hand Rubbed Clear Coat Finish?"



And I don`t mean when somebody applies a coat of wax, I mean when somebody, sands down a clear coat finish and then puts it through a series of “hand applied abrading procedures†to produce a beautify show car finish?



No is the correct answer.



And the reason for this is because modern clear coats are so hard you cannot remove defects like scratches by hand, at least not completely, and definitely not “easilyâ€.



That`s where "Foam Pad Technology" really shines, (excuse the pun), and Diminishing Abrasives come into play.



Back to your problem with the DACP.



I understand why everybody loves the Dual Action Polisher... it`s easy to use and "Safe".



The reason it`s "Safe"... is because "it doesn`t do any work".



By that I mean, it doesn`t "Move small particles of paint", the thing that is necessary in order to remove a scratch.



I call the PC, the Cyclone, and any other "Orbital" polisher, "Jiggle Machines".



That`s because for the most part, that`s what they do... they jiggle, (oscillate if you want to be all technical about it).



Because they don`t do work... they are safe, but... because they don`t do work, they will not remove scratches.



PC`s can be used to remove very fine scratches, but your success will be determined by,



Your abrasive

Your Application Material

Your Technique

The hardness of your paint, or "How workable it is".





While I cannot see, or evaluate your finish, chances are, in order to remove the defects your finish has to the point that you will be satisfied, will require a rotary buffer.



Unlike a PC, a rotary buffer "Does Work", i.e., it will move, or remove small particles of paint.



Because a rotary buffer does work, it is no longer "Safe", (like a jiggle machine), and it is no longer easy, (or at least... `as easy`).







Just a few thoughts for your consideration...

endus
06-05-2003, 11:14 AM
Originally posted by larry_bar56

The scratches I see are faint and really can`t be felt, so that`s why I thought that I should have had better results. You`re right it is a blessing to have a white car with this type of problem. I can`t imagine how much time some of the dark car owners must put in to keep them looking perfect.



As others have said, you may need a more aggressive product. Technically, you can get out any scratch with any product (as long as it has SOME level of abrasiveness) but it will take a really really long time. Just get some haveier polish and try to work the scratches specifically. You want to "feather" the edges of the area (i.e. don`t just grind away at the scratch and nothing else) but concentrate on the scratch. If it`s not down to the primer it should come out eventually. That said, it depends on how much work you`re willing to put into it as well as just how deep in the clearcoat it is.



I`m not familiar enough with the various polishes to recommend a specific product but anything from Griots/Meguiars/3m should be fine. I`m sure someone else has/will recommend the specific item from those lines to try.

imported_FUEL
06-05-2003, 11:20 AM
Originally posted by thomasfl

I don`t think he had problems, DACP removes swirls and light scratches but not all scratches. Go with the fine cut cleaner and then DACP. Also when working DACP on a damaged surface crank it up, I leave it on 5 to 5.5 when needed.



When I use FI-III I go right to vanilla moose or s100 SEC after it. Do you really need to go to DACP?

imported_Smoker
06-05-2003, 12:21 PM
I`m just working on a dark maroon metallic Intrepid with lots and lots and lots of small scratches.



Went round with DACP to clean off all the junk on the paint, but had to go round and `spot fix` with Diamond cut to really make any impact on the scratches.



I`m wondering if I used the same compounds with a rotary, would they be alot more agressive ?



I`ve about `outgrown` the PC and was wondering about how effective the products I already have would be with a rotary.

2wheelsx2
06-05-2003, 12:28 PM
Originally posted by Mike Phillips





When it comes to "Single Stage Paints", hardness is determined by "Pigment Type". The pigment used to make paint white is "Titanium Dioxide Powder", on the Mohs hardness scale it`s a 9.5.



A Diamond is a 10





Mike, I will defer the paint hardness expertise to you and other more advanced detailers, but I just wanted to point out that using the Moh`s hardness scale for paint is not accurate. That scale is for minerals. ie. a diamond being 10 is a single diamond. If you have diamond paste, or diamond sandpaper, you`ll still be able to scratch the matrix which is bonding the diamonds. I suspect that`s the same case with the white paint. The trouble is that the pigment is not being scratched, but rather the material the fills the paint in between the pigment. That`s probably why it`s hard to work with. It`s hard to level the paint, as using a foam pad probably differentially removes the matrix, but doesn`t touch the pigment, which may aggravate the appearance of a scratch.

Mike_Phillips
06-05-2003, 12:34 PM
Originally posted by Smoker

[I`ve about `outgrown` the PC and was wondering about how effective the products I already have would be with a rotary. [/B]









Dangerously more aggressive would be a better description.



I`m not trying to shy you away from learning to use one, but I wouldn`t recommend "Learning to use a rotary buffer on a Black Viper".



How abrasive a product is greatly affected by,



Application material

Application method

Time, heat and pressure

Amount of product used (sometimes more is not better)

And in the case of a rotary buffer, rotation speed and even weight



Definitely, get a variable speed buffer to learn with.



I also recommend you practice on a car that "Is not important" to anyone. Even go to a wrecking yard and pull off some hoods or deck lids to practice on.



Heck, I`ve taken my buffer to the wrecking yards and buffed on cars out there, versus dragging panels home. (I removed the original short cord from my buffer and wired in a 100` cord)



This is also how I practice trying to remove scratches from clear coats by hand. That is practicing on cars that are not important to anyone.



Hope this helps...