PDA

View Full Version : What Automakers paint is a pleasure to detail because of the high quality? Jap, Germ,



Pages : [1] 2

Bob Post
09-07-2001, 05:44 AM
American paint? All paint can be made to shine, but I`m partial to Japanese paint first, then German paint. My old VW has immaculate paint, very red and a deep, wet color. American paint is last to me, although the C4 Corvette had great paint to me, the C5`s seem to have taken a step back as the colors of the C4`s seem a lot better. Of course, Mercedes generally have great paint jobs to me, as well as Acura`s. Blk on BMW`s look great also.

What manufacturer make good paint to you judged by color, clarity, deepness or wetness, thickness and overall gloss and quality? :cool:

DETAILKING
09-07-2001, 07:57 AM
but has lots of spiderwebbing in the paint, and the clear coat is very soft. My camaro`s had a nice hard clearcoat. My silver 97 Z-28 had very durable paint. It had virtually no stone chips in it at 50K miles. Some of the paint seemed uneven and orange peely though in some light conditions. My red 1996 Z-28 had tons of stone chips (softer paint), but shined like no tomorrow.



My BMW has been good so far, nice even paint and the clear is holding up nice so far. I say it`s the winner so far, but it has only been 2 months.

Brad B
09-07-2001, 08:12 AM
My 1958 Jaguar. The Jag has the original lacquer on it from the factory. It`s really amazing for being over 40 years old. Good enough to win concours still.

<img src=http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?u=781637&a=13475239&p=51601593>



Beyond that, I am most pleased with the paint on my last few Audi`s. An absolute minimum of orange peel (much better than BMW or MB`s I`ve seen) and very durable and glossy. The Pearl on my 1991 Coupe Quattro was stunning. (Much brighter than the yellowy pearls on most others) The silver on my S4 is the brightest silver I have seen (much brighter than the Porsche). It`s blinding!

<img src=http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?u=781637&a=13475236&p=53885856>

<img src=http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?u=781637&a=13475236&p=51601524>

bmerjorge21
09-07-2001, 10:22 AM
There`s that I coupe I referred to in 216.147.22.29/forum/showthread.php3?threadid=2674&perpage=15&pagenumber=2 (`http://216.147.22.29/forum/showthread.php3?threadid=2674&perpage=15&pagenumber=2`) I knew I wasn`t crazy. Back to the question, I`ve been a big fan of Bimmer paint, and Ford I have found to be the worst. IMHO.:)

Dolphin463
09-07-2001, 10:36 AM
One of the drawbacks to being so anal about the cleanliness and shine of my BMW`s is that it exposes all of the paint flaws. My red `99 323i not only has a significant amount of orange peel on the sides, after a good coat of Blitz, it also shows imperfections in the rear fender that almost look like door dings (but aren`t).



Personally, I think the paint on the older cars was better quality and held up better. Too bad that there weren`t as many good car care products back then.

DETAILKING
09-07-2001, 10:44 AM
When I got it, it was a mess, with 40K miles on it. It had single stage paint and I didn`t know even half as much about detailing than what I know today. I used dupont #7 polish on it to clean and and polish and it worked wonderfully. Anyone ever use this? It`s real watery and brown. I finished up with NU finish, and let me tell you on that paint, I think I had more compliments on shine than any other car I owned. I will try and dig out an old pic to scan.....

Don2000g
09-07-2001, 05:17 PM
Any car that is over 40 years old and still wins Concours events must have awesome paint.

pingiii
09-07-2001, 07:55 PM
Don,



Your Right about the awesome paint, but I think the detailer has to be pretty awesome, also.



Brad,



You still set the standard the we all strive for. Enjoy!

DAC17
09-07-2001, 09:07 PM
Believe it or not, my 2001 Subaru Outback wagon in Wintergreen has the best paint of any car I`ve owned (and I`ve owned over 40 other cars). Very deep color, almost zero orange peel, and a tremendously smooth, deep feel when properly polished and waxed.



Go figure.

Ron Ketcham
09-07-2001, 09:19 PM
The application is everything. The paint on your vehicle is the same paint that Mazda, Ford, GM and DCX have been using for years, just the new 1K+ which is more etch resistant.



The smooth even apperance is due to the way the plant operators monitor the atomizing bells.



Plus maintaining the oven temperatures and the time in the ovens.







:cool:

ISLANDSBEST
09-08-2001, 12:36 AM
DK



I used the Dupont #7, too. The great thing about the single stage paints was that you could get down to new paint and then, boom, there it was: A bright, new finish, just as if you had a new, factory paint job, but one that was color sanded, because that is what you did, in effect, by using the #7 on it. Now, clear coats have many benefits, but there were certain advantages of single stage paints, too, particularly before regulations altered paint formulations.

03986
09-08-2001, 01:57 AM
2001 Black C320 Benz paint has orange peel and is very thin. No, VERY

thin. I don`t like this new eco/waer based paint from a durability and look perspective. Klasse + Blitz helps it look great. Chips and scrapes are impossible to make go away without professional help. My Volvos had excellent paint. My Older American cars had great enamel paints but my expectations then were lower for quality of shine. My 80 and 90`s Japanese labeled cars had from great to terrible paint. My newer American cars had/have orange peel and are not very durable.

09-08-2001, 04:14 AM
But still paint-related. I heard that VW uses 4 coats of paint, while Audi uses 6 coats. I wonder if this is the same with Honda/Acura, Toyota/Lexus, Nissan/Infiniti, etc?

Ron Ketcham
09-08-2001, 11:13 AM
Beau,all receive the following coating applications.

1.Ecoat

2.Surface primer (some are powdercoat, others liquid, some are anti-chip all over, some just have an anti-chip added to leading edges over the liquid surface primer

3.Basecoat (color, this is water borne, otherwords the solvent is water)

4.Clearcoat. This is a hydrocarbon/water emulsion of the carrier solvent.

All vehicles clear application is started the same way, first the bells apply a coat to all exterior surfaces (some lower line do not get cleared in the engine and trunk compartments), then a second application of clear is applied, on some vehicle manufacturered, only the top surfaces, on higher end models the entire vehicle gets two coats.



This film build of clear is 1.5 to 2 mil.



Now, it gets interesting, as some of the very high end get a third coat of clear, resulting in a 2.5 to 3 mil film build.



This does not add protection, as only the top .5 (1/2) mil of the clear actually becomes dense in the curing process. However, the additional film build does increase the "depth" apperance of the clear.



The real key is if the following is done correctly.



1. Application is even

2. Bake temperature is correct

3. Bake time in the oven is for correct time.



Failure to do correctly any of the above and the

end result is things like "orange peel", dull appearing surfaces, overly soft clear or to hard of clear, etch/mar resistance is diminished, clear may delaminate in a couple of years, become powdery, exhibit loss of gloss, etc, etc.



One other item, apply to much or excessive film build, mainly in the clearcoat subject and it will fail prematurely. More is not always better in the application of highsolid/low solvent clearcoats,



Hope this provides you with a picture of what the issues are, I am always amazed when I consider that around 35 million vehicles are built each year worldwide and there is not more problems than there are!



:eek:

ALM
09-08-2001, 11:51 AM
Ron, It would seem to me that the majority of the population doesn`t really care as much about the appeareance of their cars as we do....mabey the problems are there but people don`t report them as much because they don`t care!