M105–rotary only??

[carlsson]

I`m a newbie to the detailing world, but trying hard, and being patient over the last few months. I`m using a Cyclo along with M83 and M80 currently. Both with pretty nice results. My question is regarding M105 as I`ve heard very good things about the product.



I`m looking for something with more cut than the M83, but I`ve read that the M105 is geared more to the rotary, which I`m not using–yet. I`d like to know what equivalent, or close to anyway, out of the pro Meguiar`s line might be recommended, more fitting the dual action of the Cyclo for more serious correction.

[BigJimZ28]

but I`ve read that the M105 is geared more to the rotary



try a search and you will find that it work well by PC and hand!

and if it works well by hand it should be great with the Cyclo

[BigAl3]

the preferred method of using #105 is by rotary or hand. many have used it by D/A with excellent results, but it`s just not recommended by megs...

[efnfast]

I would be curious too - I love using 83 with my cyclo, 80 seems to be hit/miss for me, and I really can`t tell any difference when using it.



Unfortunately 83 just isn`t enough for some really deep scratches:sadpace:; wonder if 105 would do the job

[TortoiseAWD]

Another data point . . . I`ve had good luck with M105 with the Flex 3401. I`ve found it helps to keep the pad damp with a touch of quick detailer to give the M105 just a few seconds more working time.



YMMV, etc.

Tort