PDA

View Full Version : Photoshop Elements?



5IVE
05-15-2007, 12:51 PM
Anyone used this? What types of tools does this version offer? What am I losing by not getting the full photoshop program?

BlueZero
05-15-2007, 01:00 PM
I have had a few versions of elements and a few versions of full photoshop. What do you want to do with the program? Elements will give you all the basic features. There are only a few tools that I find handy that elements doesn`t have, at least the older versions I had. For my day to day cropping, color/contrast adjustments elements is more than I need. When I do photo restoration I am happy to have the full photoshop. There must be a comparison matrix online somewhere. Wish I could tell you the exact tools that are different but I gave my copy of elements away a few years ago so I don`t remember.



Edit: If you want to try a open source free version download GIMPshop. Announcing GIMPshop at Plastic Bugs (http://plasticbugs.com/index.php?p=241)

imported_Nitrox
05-17-2007, 02:28 PM
I also recommend trying gimp (or gimpshop, they are very similar). At a price of $0 it is a great deal and will save you a few hundred dollars over a full version of photoshop.

The_Terminator
05-17-2007, 02:50 PM
I use both versions regularly: PS Elements 4.0 & PS CS3.

Elements 4 is missing curves and has limited layer styles options. Those are my biggest gripes. Maybe some of this is different in Elements 5.0.



There are numerous doo-dads that are missing that i take for granted since I`ve been using the full blown photoshop for so many years, and that is the biggest frustration to me.

However, as stated above, it`s fine for day to day cropping, straightening, photo fix-ups, etc.



Photoshop is much better for being super creative, i.e. drawing from scratch. Elements is fine for general photography though.

tom p.
05-17-2007, 03:17 PM
The simple versions of PS permit the casual user plenty of options. I`ve got a stripped down version that came with a camera bundle. I`ve had tremendous use from it.

BlackElantraGT
05-17-2007, 07:23 PM
I`m not very good with either and couldn`t really tell you the main difference between the 2 program (besides Elements being easier to use). I`m a VERY casual user, mainly for general photography and eBay photos. I find that it`s easier using Elements to fix and auto-fix pics, while I mainly use PS for eBay photos when I use actions. I embed my info into all the pics so they aren`t stolen on eBay and by storing an action, I can easily put a watermark on all my pics with the press of a button.



You can almost do the same thing on Elements, but IIRC you`re not able to store it as an action. There`s a way around it though but it seemed like too much work and confusing.



Again this is from a casual user`s opinion, so please take that lightly.

imported_SHICKS
05-18-2007, 08:47 AM
Elements is great for photo editing.



Scott Kelby`s Book Elements for Digital Photographers is a must.



Steve

The_Terminator
05-18-2007, 10:55 AM
Agree about Scott Kelby`s books. They are a must! I have several of them myself, and would own all of them if I had the money!