Polishes

[ConglomrationAL]

What does everybody think of megs #2 and then #9 with a DA? Will it give good results?



Do you think they`re quality materials? they seem to cheap to be good so i`m asking to see what everyone thinks.

[the other pc]

#9 is very, very mild. IMHO it’s too mild for the DA if you want to correct flaws.



The new formula #2 has a good level of cut to it and is easy to work. Just be sure that you pick up a new bottle that says it’s for hand, orbital, DA and rotary. Some places might still have old stock on hand of the old formula (which is for rotary only).





PC.

[ConglomrationAL]

Do you think #80 would be better to use than #9?

[sspeer]

Do you think #80 would be better to use than #9?



I`d think so. #80 is a great product and has alot of fans here

[the other pc]

If you’re want to correct flaws by PC then #80 is definitely far more effective than #9. All around, #80 is and very versatile product.





PC.

[imported_smprince1]

I agree ... #80 works well via PC and #9 does very very little as far as swirl removal. Plus, I think #80 is easier to work and leave a better finish.

[ConglomrationAL]

how bout #84? Do all you guys think that is a good substitute for all the high end polishes (Like Prima or Optimum)?

[imported_Dave KG]

#9 IIRC has fillers in it, so while it will remove very mild swilrs, it is also likely to be filling them too. #80 on the other hand does not contain fillers, and removes the defects - a wipe down with IPA after using it confirms that the defects are removed rather than filled.



#84 is an aggressive compound, and while some have had good results using it by PC in terms of defect removal, it will definitely need followed with a lighter abrasive to remove the micromarring that it will leave behind. Before venturing up to using #84, I would try out #83 first as it may not be necessary to use the more aggressive compound.