jazee
03-31-2005, 11:18 AM
I`m thinking of having one of these 3M `clear bra` products applied to my new Volvo S60R. I live in the Northwest so I rarely have to deal with sand on the roads. I took a look at my 2002 Acura TL-Type-S with 30K miles and the chips on the hood and bumper are really not too bad for over three years worth of driving. Of course the car was always detailed with Klasse protectant which could have helped?
Anyway, one thing I noticed is that the nicks on the plastic bumper appear to be fewer or definitely less noticeable then the ones on the hood. The nicks on the hood expose the white primer where the nicks on the bumper are black. (The car is a dark-medium `Agean` blue metallic.)
The design of the S60R is unique in that to give the hood a much lower profile, the bumper comes way up and curves to meet the edge of the hood unlike most cars where the hood curves down quite a bit to meet the edge of the grill.
The Stongard piece for the bumper is $309! It`s a super complicated piece, so add professional install to that and that`s just one of the pieces!
So I`m thinking is this stuff really worth it? Especially when the film is going to gets nicks in it itself anyway? If the bumper because of the flexible clear coat protectant is already tougher than the hood, Stongard seems like overkill. Stongard is of course going to save some nicks but during resale, people expect nicks on the bumper and hood anyway. Some skilled use of touch up paint and a little wet sanding can take care of any large noticeable nicks.
I think it is definitely a good idea to put the stuff on the lights since they cost so much to replace. That leaves the hood. Do I really want a line of plastic film going across my hood, especially when it appears it`s the bumber that is going to take most the beating on this car?
Seems like just putting a couple of coats of Klasse SG every 6 months or so may be a better way to go than having this plastic film all over my car?
Thanks for your input.
http://www.crist.com/images/front.jpg
Anyway, one thing I noticed is that the nicks on the plastic bumper appear to be fewer or definitely less noticeable then the ones on the hood. The nicks on the hood expose the white primer where the nicks on the bumper are black. (The car is a dark-medium `Agean` blue metallic.)
The design of the S60R is unique in that to give the hood a much lower profile, the bumper comes way up and curves to meet the edge of the hood unlike most cars where the hood curves down quite a bit to meet the edge of the grill.
The Stongard piece for the bumper is $309! It`s a super complicated piece, so add professional install to that and that`s just one of the pieces!
So I`m thinking is this stuff really worth it? Especially when the film is going to gets nicks in it itself anyway? If the bumper because of the flexible clear coat protectant is already tougher than the hood, Stongard seems like overkill. Stongard is of course going to save some nicks but during resale, people expect nicks on the bumper and hood anyway. Some skilled use of touch up paint and a little wet sanding can take care of any large noticeable nicks.
I think it is definitely a good idea to put the stuff on the lights since they cost so much to replace. That leaves the hood. Do I really want a line of plastic film going across my hood, especially when it appears it`s the bumber that is going to take most the beating on this car?
Seems like just putting a couple of coats of Klasse SG every 6 months or so may be a better way to go than having this plastic film all over my car?
Thanks for your input.
http://www.crist.com/images/front.jpg