PDA

View Full Version : IS SSR2.5 usually...



TUD
02-22-2006, 10:09 PM
thinner in constancy vs. SSR 1 & SSR2?

Neo62381
02-22-2006, 10:32 PM
other way around... :-D

imported_truzoom
02-22-2006, 10:32 PM
I found it more gloopy than SSR1. Never used SSR2 so can`t comment.



SSR2.5 has a noticable gritty texture to it, while SSR1 reminds me of public bathroom soap.

a.k.a. Patrick
02-22-2006, 10:56 PM
I find the actual consistency about the same, texture is a little more gritty though.....1 & 2 are a little creamier though....

EBPcivicsi
02-23-2006, 07:23 AM
Wow, my SSR1 is like water, the 2 is like a "regular" polish (like hand lotion), and 2.5 is so thick that I have "slam" the end of the bottle against my hand when the it becomes half full.

TUD
02-23-2006, 09:26 AM
The reason I asked, I got my SSRs yesterday. 1 & 2 are much thicker (even after vigorous shaking) then the 2.5 which is definately thinner.

EBPcivicsi
02-23-2006, 09:47 AM
The reason I asked, I got my SSRs yesterday. 1 & 2 are much thicker (even after vigorous shaking) then the 2.5 which is definately thinner.





That sounds totally wrong to me, but my polishes are about 1 year old--perhaps there have been changes to the formulas???



I would contact Steve via detailcity(don`t say anything ant-vendor over there) and see what he says. Either way Steve will know and will take care of it.

TUD
02-23-2006, 10:15 AM
That sounds totally wrong to me, but my polishes are about 1 year old--perhaps there have been changes to the formulas???



I would contact Steve via detailcity(don`t say anything ant-vendor over there) and see what he says. Either way Steve will know and will take care of it.









Gottca :2thumbs:

TUD
02-23-2006, 11:36 AM
Steve`s reply, "No SSR2.5 should be thicker than 1 & 2 by a lot." :bolt

EBPcivicsi
02-23-2006, 11:58 AM
Steve`s reply, "No SSR2.5 should be thicker than 1 & 2 by a lot." :bolt





That is inline with my experience as well.