Signature Series II

[TGates]

http://www.autogeek.net/pisiseiispof.html



I just got a can of the "old" one in the mail yesterday. :hairpull

[jahazii]

Hey guys I was looking at the chart LINK (http://www.dano.pocketrubbish.com/detailing/productchart.htm) about the different product "cut" can someone please compare the chemical guys products with a few of the other products lines.

[TGates]

Uhm, maybe it would be better if you started a new thread to ask this question as it really has nothing to do with Pinnacle Signature Series II wax.

[ZaneO]

I`d contact Autogeek to see if you can exchange it.

[TGates]

I`d contact Autogeek to see if you can exchange it.



I think it`s worth a shot. I`ll give them a call tomorrow. I`m not holding my breath, though. That`s a great price for the new Sig, CM and a MF. I got the old one (just the jar of wax) for $19.99.

[Mad iX]

Hmm ... deeper and wetter?

The `old` version wasn`t bad at all compared to Souveran. I wonder how close they are now.

Perhaps Souveran is in for a reformulation as well?

[SilverLexus]

The `old` version wasn`t bad at all compared to Souveran.



Souveran is notably more wet in my opinion but Signature is a good wax.

[Dtail]

Souveran looks darker and richer compared to signature wax. I find the signature wax more comparable to s100 wax. Signature wax looks wetter than s100 though. But both give a brighter shine than souveran. I wonder how Sig II looks though.

[eclipsegt05]

I was always a fan of paste glaz over signature series, but I`d like to see if sig. II can top paste glaz in looks.