I’ve read that too, but nobody who says it ever has any evidence or even a logical argument of any kind to support the concept.
The only times I’ve ever seen or even heard of clay marring paint were cases of especially aggressive clay or unusually sensitive paint. In those cases the marring happened immediately. It’s not like it showed up over time because they “clayed too often.� And those cases are unusual anyway.
In every other situation the clay either does good by removing contaminants or does nothing because there aren't any. There certainly isn’t any damage done.
As long as you don’t have weird paint that mars when you look at it funny and you stick to mild clays like Sonus’ green or Meg’s white, about the only way to mar paint with it is to apply it with a claw hammer.
I would also argue that as long as you are claying until the contaminants are gone, claying one a month or once a year are the same anyway. You’re removing the same total amount of gunk. So whether you take it all off at once or take it off a little at a time you’re claying the same amount. One pass a month for a year is no different than 12 passes once a year or 6 passes twice a year, except that the gunk spends less time on your paint.
The great thing about clay is that learning how to use it is really easy and doesn’t take much time at all.
PC.