It seem that countries with more social policies is not necessariy unfriendly to business.
Forbes link for report....
Forbes Welcome
It seem that countries with more social policies is not necessariy unfriendly to business.
Forbes link for report....
Forbes Welcome
Al
The Need to Bead
It did not say it was good for people in general..just business.
Al
The Need to Bead
Used to be those two things went hand in hand.
A society willing to trade liberty for temporary security deserves neither and will lose both
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕPost Thanks / Like - 1 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 DislikesRonkh liked this post
Yep
Formerly the "Best Detailer", now just Super Wax Waster Man. Not necessarily tactful, but normally right. It`s good to be da King !!!
And the tax rate in Denmark was 50%... How fun can that be???
Yeah, sign me up...
I barely survived the 33% bracket..
DanF
Speaking of FUN - I was researching Dealership Compounds for Bennylava and stumbled on to this - written by a guy that is supposed to know all about Detailing..
http://www.autodealermonthly.com/cha...detailing.aspx
Especially LOVE what he tells the Dealers about experienced Detailers vs no-nothing illegals, etc...
Just skip to that paragraph - Detail Personnel - if it takes too long, ok?
Dan F
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 Dislikesrlmccarty2000 liked this post
Wow. That Bud Abraham guy that wrote that article has a low opinion of detailers. He needs to show up to Detailfest with that attitude. Pretty disgusting.
It looks like best attribute of a potential production detailer is have a brain or anything about about quality.
Al
The Need to Bead
Formerly the "Best Detailer", now just Super Wax Waster Man. Not necessarily tactful, but normally right. It`s good to be da King !!!
While I (of course ) find that utterly despicable....isn`t it a States` Rights Issue? I thought the Federalist idea was that if you don`t like that then you move to a state that doesn`t do it.
No, no...I`m not saying that makes it OK and I`d be FURIOUS if I lived there. I`m just thinking out loud as this is different from many of the other issues that get discussed in the States` Rights context as it`s not actually a matter of infringing one somebody`s Personal Rights. (Yeah, of course I see how it could/would be used for that..again I`m just discussing it.)
Personal rights ????
Formerly the "Best Detailer", now just Super Wax Waster Man. Not necessarily tactful, but normally right. It`s good to be da King !!!
Did I overdo the shorthand? I was separating it from the current "Bathroom Issue" which I see as a means of discriminating and thus violating a Person`s Rights.
And I was thinking of the "Personal" vs. "Collective" Rights. (Perhaps I need corrected?!?)
What I meant specifically was that it`s not an infringement of the Right to Bear Arms (which the SCOTUS at least *currently* views as an Individual Right). It`s (supposedly..yeah, right) "just" a database... that could be misused to do that. Like auto/etc. registration. Nobody gets too worried about Big Brother knowing what cars we drive (on public roads)...in a sense there`s a database listing Corvette owners! OK, that`s maybe a stretch..or maybe I`m utterly off-base here
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 DislikesRonkh liked this post
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks