Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Darth Camaro 12/27/15 Don's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    2,466
    Post Thanks / Like

    Machine application issues ... It was the PADS!

    IT WAS THE PADS!!

    So like I mentioned earlier, I was going to use a Meguiar`s yellow polishing pad to see if I had any better luck applying the Ult Liquid... MAN DID I EVER! 4 dime sized drops to prime the pad and that amount did the entire hood, 4 more drops, the entire roof and 2 drops the trunk lid. After that 4 drops would do two complete panels. I did have to go over each panel several times, because I couldn`t really see for sure where it had been applied and where it hadn`t.

    For removal, there was no buffing involved, just an easy wipe with a clean microfiber, this is where I found out for sure I had covered every bit of the car, there was a light tug, then smoothness on the second pass. There were no oily swirls, streaks, dark patches, nothing but paint with a super high gloss ... I`m extremely pleased with the process and the results. My suggestion to anyone having trouble like I was ... switch to a slightly firmer pad, it makes a world of a difference
    Don M

    Proud owner of a 2017
    SUPERCHARGED
    Hyper-Blue Metallic 2LT 6/Manual
    Camaro


  2. #2
    Detailing Gnosis Bunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hillsborough, NC
    Posts
    8,305
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Machine application issues ... It was the PADS!

    What pads were you using?

    I had tried using a Rupes with a HT Crimson and it seemed to hop a little so switched back to B&S blue and problem solved.

    Al
    The Need to Bead


  3. #3
    Darth Camaro 12/27/15 Don's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    2,466
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Machine application issues ... It was the PADS!

    Quote Originally Posted by Bunky View Post
    What pads were you using?

    I had tried using a Rupes with a HT Crimson and it seemed to hop a little so switched back to B&S blue and problem solved.
    I was using LC variable contact black finishing pads (they were old, but in good shape). The pads absorbed a good 90 percent of the Ult Wax and never released it onto the paint and one of them collapsed on me. I didn`t let the second one get that far, because I had recognized the signs of collapse and just quit using it and went to hand application. The LC pads were A LOT softer and more absorbent than the Megs hand applicator pad and the Megs yellow polishing pads were more like the hand applicator in in firmness and aggressiveness.

    I did get a little color off of the roof (ss paint) but all in all things went extremely well with near perfect THIN, THIN, THIN application. Just a whisper of product on the paint. The polishing pad even seemed to clean up well after soaking in a 1:1 Simple Green solution for about two hours. So my opinion is that some finishing pads are just too soft & absorbent for sealant/wax application.
    Don M

    Proud owner of a 2017
    SUPERCHARGED
    Hyper-Blue Metallic 2LT 6/Manual
    Camaro


  4. #4
    MiVor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Central New York - Finger Lakes Region
    Posts
    471
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Machine application issues ... It was the PADS!

    Just my $.02, but I think sometimes a softer (less dense) pad sucks and holds product deep in the pad instead of putting it down on the surface. `It`s said` (somewhere) that these softer pads are for for LSP application, but I think my white `polishing` pad (a medium density) works better.
    Likes Thomas Dekany, KBsToy liked this post

  5. #5
    Darth Camaro 12/27/15 Don's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    2,466
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Machine application issues ... It was the PADS!

    Quote Originally Posted by MiVor View Post
    Just my $.02, but I think sometimes a softer (less dense) pad sucks and holds product deep in the pad instead of putting it down on the surface. `It`s said` (somewhere) that these softer pads are for for LSP application, but I think my white `polishing` pad (a medium density) works better.


    Well, I`m "proof" of "What`s said somewhere." The firmer, denser pad was the magic bullet for my troubles.
    Don M

    Proud owner of a 2017
    SUPERCHARGED
    Hyper-Blue Metallic 2LT 6/Manual
    Camaro


  6. #6
    MiVor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Central New York - Finger Lakes Region
    Posts
    471
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Machine application issues ... It was the PADS!

    Quote Originally Posted by Don View Post
    Well, I`m "proof" of "What`s said somewhere." The firmer, denser pad was the magic bullet for my troubles.
    What I meant was that pad mfg`s recommend the softer (less dense) pads for LSP`s (perhaps just to sell more), but they just don`t seem to work as well as the firmer (higher density) pads.

  7. #7
    Darth Camaro 12/27/15 Don's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    2,466
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Machine application issues ... It was the PADS!

    Quote Originally Posted by MiVor View Post
    What I meant was that pad mfg`s recommend the softer (less dense) pads for LSP`s (perhaps just to sell more), but they just don`t seem to work as well as the firmer (higher density) pads.
    An expensive lesson for me, since I wasted so much UPW on only 3 cars
    Don M

    Proud owner of a 2017
    SUPERCHARGED
    Hyper-Blue Metallic 2LT 6/Manual
    Camaro


  8. #8
    MiVor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Central New York - Finger Lakes Region
    Posts
    471
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Machine application issues ... It was the PADS!

    Quote Originally Posted by Don View Post
    An expensive lesson for me, since I wasted so much UPW on only 3 cars
    Sometimes lessons cost a little, sometimes a lot - it`s a sliding scale. The important thing is that they`re learned!

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    86,984
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Machine application issues ... It was the PADS!

    Don- Glad you got things dialed in. I too generally prefer firmer pads; as long as the pad doesn`t have any cut in-and-of itself it`s usually soft enough for me to LSP with. Wasn`t all *that* long ago that they simply didn`t *make* the extra-soft LSPing pads and I did fine back then too. But I don`t have problematic/stupid-soft paint either.

    I *do* hear that the LC gold LSPing pad is really good though, still intend to try it out some day. Eh, I never did really like those black LC pads, still have a few of `em just sitting around unused.

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Machine vs Hand Application
    By AustrianOak82 in forum Machine Polishing & Sanding
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-10-2014, 01:08 PM
  2. Autoglym HD application issues
    By in forum Waxes, Sealants, and LSP's
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 11-27-2010, 01:20 PM
  3. HD Uno machine application questions
    By Rekord in forum 3D / High Definition Car Care
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-04-2009, 04:47 PM
  4. EX Machine Application
    By ACE in forum Poorboy's World Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-08-2004, 08:59 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •