Autopia.org - #1 auto detailing forum for car enthusiasts and professional detailers.
Autopia.org Articles, Editorial & Blogs for Car Detailing Enthusiasts Autopia Reviews: Auto Detailing Car Wax, Polish, Cleaner, Protectant Reviews Detailing Products & Supplies Catalog
Go Back   Autopia.org > CAR DETAILING & FINISH CARE > Machine Polishing


Welcome to Autopia.org.


You are viewing as a guest.  By joining our FREE community you will be able to interact with others.  Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today.   When you join, this box is replaced with our live chat!

Autopia Marketplace

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes

Old 02-22-05, 07:37   #1 (permalink)
numa numa...
 
merci is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Planet Autopia!
Posts: 460
[Meguiar's] #83 DACP not enough

Hi,

I used #83 DACP on a W7000 cutting pad but it didn't do much for the scratches. I passed over the area twice with no additional pressure on the Makita 9227C.

I polished until it was no longer visible (no film present) but I did not let it dust at all.

The car has dual-stage paint.

Should I resort to #2 Fine Cut Cleaner or #84 Compound Power Cleaner?

I know for a fact from this thread that #2 Fine Cut Cleaner is more agressive than #83 DACP but I'm not sure how it measures up to #84 especially on BC/CC paint.

TIA!
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 02-22-05, 07:42   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Bill D's Avatar
 
Bill D is offline
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Birthplace of Speed
Posts: 8,733
I thought I read that some have had success by using some pressure initially, getting the product worked in well, then easing off . What RPM are you using? I know other, more frequent #83 users will chime in here.
__________________
my product collection
My Detailing Credo
Treat it like it's the only one in the world.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 02-22-05, 07:56   #3 (permalink)
The Swirlmallows
 
klnyc's Avatar
 
klnyc is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,100
Contact: Send a message via AIM to klnyc
Hmm, my #83 didnt work so good either. But , when bust out the SSR 2.5 and SSR3, it work out great. It remove alot of swirl and some deep scratches too.
Try those PW SSR and give a shot.
__________________
Extra coat?
Ken
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 02-22-05, 09:44   #4 (permalink)
numa numa...
 
merci is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Planet Autopia!
Posts: 460
I've watched a Meg's video clip online which suggested using pressure initially when working with the cutting pad to fully work in the diminishing abrasives. A lot of the Autopia posts on rotary usage suggest using only the machine's weight for pressure.

I was using around 1200-1400rpm. Again, the Meg's video I watched suggested about 1500rpm to 2000rpm for "best results" but then again this same video showed the detailer spin the pad to that rpm setting before it touched the paint to pick up the bead of polish.



Of course, I followed Autopian standards by starting the rotary with the pad on the paint (and on the product). I used 600rpm to "pick up" the foot-long bead of DACP and gradually upped it to 1200-1400rpm and kept it at that rate for about a minute or two - at which time the DACP was no longer visibly present (no dusting).

I have Menzerna IP on hand with a CMA Orange Power Pad waiting in the wings but both products are milder than #83 DACP with the W7000 cutting pad. As much as possible, I'd want to stick to Meg's products for the purposes of this discussion.

Any other questions or suggestions?
__________________
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 02-28-05, 07:49   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
wannafbody is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,321
#2 Fine Cut is recommended for rotary use not PC-Poorboys SSR's tend to work better with a PC than a rotary from what i've read
__________________
2000 WS6 TA NBM
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-01-05, 06:31   #6 (permalink)
Just Obsessed
 
Alfisti's Avatar
 
Alfisti is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 2,360
I'm going to be naughty by ignoring your request to stick to Megs and suggest you try Menzerna PowerGloss.

More powerful than IP but breaks down to the same level leaving a very reasonable finish.
__________________
Paul Marmarinos
Flawless Prestige Car & Boat Detailing

I was on Autopia before the stars were torn down.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-01-05, 07:26   #7 (permalink)
In to the realm 2003
 
tripper_11 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Republica Filipinas
Posts: 241
Try to apply a "little" pressure but keep moving. (and not to mention the fact the Makita 9227 is the lightest rotary in its class.) This I do when #83 seems not cutting the surface. If that doesn't do, try a more aggressive product.

Although we have a set of do's and dont's here in Autopia, I'd say they're just the general rules. There's always an exception.
__________________
I don't go by REFLECTIONS, but the WET-LOOK factor. If reflections coincided with my end-result, it's merely INCIDENTAL... - JMGarcia
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-01-05, 08:28   #8 (permalink)
numa numa...
 
merci is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Planet Autopia!
Posts: 460
wannafbody, I am using a rotary - the Makita 9227C.

Alfisti, I'd love to use PowerGloss but I'll have to stick to Meg's for now.

tripper_11, would I be correct if I assumed that you're holding the Makita on its "head" instead of the handle? I'll give it a shot next time around. I will try to up the speed along with the pressure if added pressure alone won't do the job.

The question as to whether I should go with #84 or #2 is still unanswered.

Although #2 was originally used for single-stage paint, is it as aggressive as #84 on BC/CC paint? Which one should I use? Either way, I'll end up using another W7000.
__________________
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-02-05, 04:03   #9 (permalink)
Banned
 
Mizzuri's Avatar
 
Mizzuri is offline
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 143
hi,

One thing to consider is that you are actually marring the paint with DACP and W7000. Have you tried folllowing it with a finer pad and swirl remover?

If that is not the answer, (worth a try) then the compound cleaner #84 is a good next step for you. If you are worried about it being too aggresive try it with a polishing pad first then move up to the cutting pad if it is not successfull.

good luck
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-02-05, 05:50   #10 (permalink)
numa numa...
 
merci is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Planet Autopia!
Posts: 460
Quote:
Originally posted by Mizzuri
One thing to consider is that you are actually marring the paint with DACP and W7000. Have you tried folllowing it with a finer pad and swirl remover?

If that is not the answer, (worth a try) then the compound cleaner #84 is a good next step for you. If you are worried about it being too aggresive try it with a polishing pad first then move up to the cutting pad if it is not successfull.

Yeah, I'm aware that DACP can mar the paint - but I know this to be true only if you stop buffing too early (before the "buffered abrasives" have completely broken down). In my case, I buffed it out until it was invisible (no film left) but I did not wait for any dust to be visible. I did not notice any marring so I guess I did the right thing. Or did I?

I did follow #83 with #80 under a W-8000 polishing pad (didn't have any stronger stuff available then, hence my question) but that didn't do anything for the scratches.

The score thus far is:

#83 again but w/ "light-to-moderate" pressure - 1
#84 - 1
#2 - nil

Whichever I end up going with, I'll be using Meg's soft buff cutting pad (W-7000).
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:50.


Copyright (c), 1999-2009, Autopia.org - All Rights Reserved

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65