Welcome to Autopia.org.
You are viewing as a guest.
By joining our FREE community you will be able to interact with others. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today. When you join, this box is replaced with our live chat!
|
11-26-06, 10:28
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
pgp is offline
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 160
|
Digital Camera opinions
Hello , I am looking at digital cameras. This will be my first one. I guess it will be used for outside shots mostly. Any suggestions would be appreciated!
I am thinking of these models or similar.
Nikon CoolpixL4.........CanonA530.....FugipixA400/500
|
|
|
|
11-26-06, 01:54
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
SayNoToPistons
another qx4 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 366
Contact:
|
Re: Digital Camera opinions
Ditch in a little more for the Canon A540 6.0 megapixel (its a great deal for the price). The A530 would be the best out of the three you posted though.
Steves Digicams - Canon Powershot A540 - User Review
I have a A520 myeslf. 4.0 megapixels. Simple basic camera with great picture quality for the price with lots of manual settings to play with (aperture, exposure, manual focus, flash, etc).
__________________
Mazda RX8 Velocity red mica
Infiniti QX brillant silver
|
|
|
|
11-26-06, 03:20
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Canyoneer
John Styrnol is offline
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 4,314
|
Re: Digital Camera opinions
I'm really liking the Canon's right now.
__________________
My Home Page
00 Explorer XLT
MODS: 31" BFG AT/KO, SilverStars, Diamond Clear Heads/Corners, Rancho RS5000, Cragar Soft 8, MagnaFlow, K&N FIPK II
|
|
|
|
11-26-06, 06:21
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Self Professed Knowitall
Grimm is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Muskegon, MI
Posts: 748
|
Re: Digital Camera opinions
It looks like you are looking for something under $150, but if you can stretch it to $275 and want a great camera with an awesome zoom lens check out the Panasonic DMC-FZ7. I just got one, and haven't had a chance to take many pics yet, but from all my research it is one of the best point and shoots for outdoor pictures.
|
|
|
|
11-26-06, 06:29
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
kpounds is offline
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 411
|
Re: Digital Camera opinions
Search in the forums for 'digital camera' and there's some good threads around. Also Google 'digital camera reviews'. I picked up a Kodak 5mp DC and have been very happy with it. I think Kodak produces a high quality camera at a resaonable price.
|
|
|
|
11-26-06, 06:29
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
pgp is offline
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 160
|
Re: Digital Camera opinions
Grim that would be some stretch, Thanks everyone for the relpys. I want to keep it low cost since I don't know how much I will use it. I did see the Panas had 6x zoom which I probably would be able to use.
|
|
|
|
11-26-06, 06:54
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Self Professed Knowitall
Grimm is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Muskegon, MI
Posts: 748
|
Re: Digital Camera opinions
|
|
|
|
11-27-06, 08:18
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Go Tigers!
TigerMike is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Memphis
Posts: 1,237
|
Re: Digital Camera opinions
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pgp
Hello , I am looking at digital cameras. This will be my first one. I guess it will be used for outside shots mostly. Any suggestions would be appreciated!
I am thinking of these models or similar.
Nikon CoolpixL4.........CanonA530.....FugipixA400/500
|
From the cameras you are considering, I would take the Canon hands down. The other two will not have the sharp picture quality and flexibility of the A series Canon. BTW, the A series are some of the best values in cameras out there for their picture quality, price point, and features. Gotta love the swivel flip-out panels too!
I own a A95 (older 5MP cam) and love it! I want the new A640 though (10MP)!
Regards,
Mike
__________________
2003 G35 - protected & perfected with Zaino [Zaino, made for those who refuse to live in a world full of compromises]
|
|
|
|
11-27-06, 08:22
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Danase is online now
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,736
|
Re: Digital Camera opinions
I would go with the Canon. I have has Sony, HP, and Canon. The Sony was decent but ate batteries. The HP ate batteries like water. The Canon I know have has an excellent battery life. I can not believe how much use I can get out of the 4 rechargable batteries before needing to recharge. The picture quality is great and the camera has a lot of features/functions that are easy to use along with a good auto function.
__________________
Owner of Danase Detailing Supply
|
|
|
|
11-27-06, 08:29
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
member from the old board
tom p. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: boston
Posts: 3,941
|
Re: Digital Camera opinions
I would get a very good camera that has been phased out or in the process of being phased out. You'll get the best value that way - - perhaps more than you've bargained for.
I've had several Canons (pro-sumer versions), an early Kodak, an Oly, and my most recent acquisition: a cheap SONY that get great pictures.
Avoid: cheap cameras fitted with crappy, tiny lenses.
Happy hunting!
__________________
Presta - - Re-defining "gloss"
|
|
|
|
11-27-06, 09:10
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Yal is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY, Long Island
Posts: 808
|
Re: Digital Camera opinions
Here's an article from the NY times to help you also.....
The Truth About Digital Cameras by David Pogue Technical Writer for the NYTIMES
As loyal Pogue’s Posts readers are no doubt aware, I’ve spent the last seven weeks in TV land, filming a first batch of six episodes of my new Discovery-network series, “It’s All Geek to Me.” It was an exhilarating, exhausting, enlightening journey. Someday when we’re all together, I’ll tell you about it.
Actually, I’ll tell you about one thing right now. We did an episode on digital cameras. Part of the fun involved visiting a couple of big electronics stores, posing as somebody who didn’t know much about cameras, and, later, commenting on what they told me.
The clerks at one store recognized me. The guy at the other store had no clue that I’m a tech writer. Both of them were surprisingly frank, pointing out, for example, that five megapixels is plenty for prints up to smallish poster size.
Now, every time I write that, I hear from furious or baffled readers. “I don’t get it,” wrote one. “A ten-megapixel camera produces photos about 3640 pixels wide-enough to make a 12-inch print at 300 dpi (dots per inch) on a good printer. Sure, you can go lower, but quality is sacrificed; you can’t make an 11×14 print, let alone anything bigger.”
I have to say, the math sounds right. But I also have to say that he’s wrong.
On the show, we did a test. We blew up a photograph to 16 x 24 inches at a professional photo lab. One print had 13-megapixel resolution; one had 8; the third had 5. Same exact photo, down-rezzed twice, all three printed at the same poster size. I wanted to hang them all on a wall in Times Square and challenge passersby to see if they could tell the difference.
Even the technician at the photo lab told me that I was crazy, that there’d be a huge difference between 5 megapixels and 13.
I’m prepared to give away the punch line of this segment, because hey-the show doesn’t air till February, and you’ll have forgotten all about what you read here today, right?
Anyway, we ran the test for about 45 minutes. Dozens of people stopped to take the test; a little crowd gathered. About 95 percent of the volunteers gave up, announcing that there was no possible way to tell the difference, even when mashing their faces right up against the prints. A handful of them attempted guesses-but were wrong. Only one person correctly ranked the prints in megapixel order, although (a) she was a photography professor, and (b) I believe she just got lucky.
I’m telling you, there was NO DIFFERENCE.
This post is going to get a lot of people riled up, I know, because in THEORY, you should be able to see a difference. But you can’t.
And I’m hoping this little test can save you some bucks the next time you’re shopping for a camera.
|
|
|
|
11-27-06, 03:56
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Self Professed Knowitall
Grimm is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Muskegon, MI
Posts: 748
|
Re: Digital Camera opinions
Very cool article. At any rate, if I were pgp, I would get whatever I could afford in a good zoom camera. My first is a Canon A20, and while it takes good pics for what it is, the 3X zoom is a bummer. I have had many times where I wish I had more zoom. I would try to look for one of the 6X optical zoom cameras. And don't pay any attention to digital zoom as it can ruin a good picture.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:35. |
|
|
|