Ford continues to struggle...

SilverLexus · 08-17-06, 07:28

http://online.wsj.com/public/us

Sad....

WSUcommuter · 08-17-06, 07:34

I see the headline but it wants me to join to view...

truzoom · 08-17-06, 08:57

*edit

nevermind.

Tasty · 08-17-06, 09:52

Solution, make a better product. Ford makes some really ugly, crappy cars, as does GM. Not to get started on another American car bashing thread, but these two companies have to rethink their product, not just keep laying people off. The Mustang is an uninspiring car that should be inspiring, the F-150 Triton powerplant totally lacks backbone, and Ford only maintains top numbers in many categories because of fleet sales. My brother recently got a brand new F-150 crew cab as a company vehicle which he mocks relentlessly. We drove it around the other day and did many take-offs from a dead stop with the pedal on the floor. Absolutely underwhelming performance.

truzoom · 08-17-06, 10:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tasty

My brother recently got a brand new F-150 crew cab as a company vehicle which he mocks relentlessly. We drove it around the other day and did many take-offs from a dead stop with the pedal on the floor. Absolutely underwhelming performance.

I suppose that doesn't really surprise me. I've felt the new bodied F150s look too large for Ford's relatively conservative HP/TQ figures.

But hey, a truck is a truck. It's got a job to do (one would hope), so why gauge it like a car?

Setec Astronomy · 08-17-06, 10:23

Mustang uninspiring? I think it's a great looking car, much better than the Mustangs of the last couple decades. I haven't liked a Mustang since the '79 Indy pace car replica which begat the '80 Cobra. But they messed with that after a couple years...the first SVO was cool, but...

I wish you bashers would make up your mind who is making their numbers with fleet sales...because in this thread it's Ford, while in the GM bashing thread, it was GM. They can't both be leading the same segments. Seems to me there are a bunch of Camry's in the rental fleets too...I swear if I took a Camry and put a Ford or Chevy logo on it you guys would hate it too.

wytstang · 08-17-06, 10:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setec Astronomy

Mustang uninspiring? I think it's a great looking car, much better than the Mustangs of the last couple decades. I haven't liked a Mustang since the '79 Indy pace car replica which begat the '80 Cobra. But they messed with that after a couple years...the first SVO was cool, but...

I wish you bashers would make up your mind who is making their numbers with fleet sales...because in this thread it's Ford, while in the GM bashing thread, it was GM. They can't both be leading the same segments. Seems to me there are a bunch of Camry's in the rental fleets too...I swear if I took a Camry and put a Ford or Chevy logo on it you guys would hate it too.

Agreed the fact that the Mustang has out lived many other cars both import and domestic is saying something. Also the fact that many many imports and domestic (namely the Dodge SRT4) target the Mustang then any other domestic car just tells me they have been butt raped by a stang and left bitter way to many times

.

Tasty · 08-17-06, 10:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by truzoom

I suppose that doesn't really surprise me. I've felt the new bodied F150s look too large for Ford's relatively conservative HP/TQ figures.

But hey, a truck is a truck. It's got a job to do (one would hope), so why gauge it like a car?

I'm not gauging it like a car. Torque is what moves your vehicle off the line, the F-150 doesn't have enough of it IMO. Nissan and Toyota get more HP AND torque out of their V6s in midsize trucks than Ford does in its FULL size. I just don't get it. I love the looks of the F-150, it just needs some balls.

Setec - I'll give you that the Mustang looks better now than it has in years, but the design I thought was spectacular when it came out now looks stale to me. The rear end needs some retooling. I don't hate American car makers, the just need to make all their cars the way I like them. Easy enough right?

Also, your right about fleet sales to some extent. It seems the Camry is a major leader in fleet sales, but the F-150 hasn't been the number one selling truck in the country for 29 years or whatever it is with strictly individual owner sales. I think we can all connect the dots on how that vehicle stays on top.

Setec Astronomy · 08-17-06, 10:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tasty

I'll give you that the Mustang looks better now than it has in years, but the design I thought was spectacular when it came out now looks stale to me.

Why...because it looks like an almost 40 yo design?

Quote:

I don't hate American car makers, the just need to make all their cars the way I like them. Easy enough right?

Yeah, that's it! Maybe you'll be more successful than me, I'm a GM man and I can't get GM to make them the way I like them, either.

EdLancer · 08-19-06, 11:00

The Mustang and the Lincoln LS is the only FORD product that I like or buy if I had the money ...LoL

I rent Towncars when I have an urge to smoke cigars on longer trips.

Scottwax · 08-19-06, 11:37

Other than the Mustang and F-250s, I can't think of a Ford product I'd realisticly own (Ford GT doesn't count, I can't afford it). Plus, after owning a Mazda which is 30% Ford, I can't say the reliability is there for Ford or Mazda.

rjstaaf · 08-20-06, 10:12

I am on my 4th Ford not counting those my family had when I was a kid and I can't really agree that they aren't reliable as that hasn't been my experience. Of the Ford vehicles we had when I was a kid I recall a 1965 Ford Mustang Coupe and a 1967 Comet Wagon and then a 1971 Ford LTD Country Squire Wagon.

My first Ford was the LTD Wagon (it was also my first car, a hand me down from my dad). We bought it new and I traded it in with close to 150,000 miles for a 1981 Ford Courier pickup. Yes, the Courier is a Mazda but, it had the Ford 2.3l engine in it. The truck had 12 miles on it when I bought it and 110,000 when I sold it. I NEVER had a single issue with either other than a clutch that I wore out in Courier.

My third Ford is my Mustang. It currently has 76,000 miles and again the only problem I have ever had was a carbon fouled idle air control valve. I could have just cleaned it and re-installed it but, I decided to replace it. The car has been rock solid reliable.

We also have a 2004 Taurus. The Taurus currently has 35,000 miles and not a single problem out of it either.

I think it if you look at differences in how the US auto industry and the Japanese auto industry are run you will see how they have an advantage.

First and foremost is the Japanese auto industry is heavily subsidized by their government.

Second they do not have any kind of retirement or pensions. When you retire it is your family who supports you in Japan. Yes, they do offer retirement packages to their workers in the US but, consider that they have only had plants here for close to 30 years. Think about how many workers they are supporting vs how many the US auto industry is supporting.

Given those two advantages I have seen several articles that figure the Japanese have a $1500 advantage on each and every vehicle they build. It is not that we cannot build a vehicle comparible in quality to the Japanese, it is that we cannot build a vehicle comparible without cutting into profits on the already small margin.

Over the years it seems even our own government has done its own fair share of sabotage on the US auto industry. Toyota was able to establish their foothold here in the US at GM's expense...

Quote:

Stelzer describes the events in which "our own government sabotaged General Motors in favor of Japanese car companies, and which led to the problems now confronting GM."

First, was the acquisition by GM dealerships of Japanese auto franchises. In 1966 as a GM executive, Stelzer opposed this policy. In a confrontation with a GM dealer, Burt Chevrolet, which wanted to take on a Toyota franchise, Stelzer reminded the dealer that in 1937, "GM had put up 75 percent of the capital to start his dealership, with a generous contract that allowed him to assume full ownership out of profits." Stelzer told Burt: "...[l]f you want to take on Toyota that is your prerogative, but not in Chevrolet facilities, nor utilization of any personnel in this dealership who had been trained by General Motors. If you take on Toyota it will be at another location with no ties to Chevy facilities or personnel."

The result of the confrontation is related by Stelzer:

"Three days later I received a call from a GM Vice-President who applauded me for my stand, but who said that Toyota had complained to the U.S. State Department, and that a high government official had ordered GM, and me, to allow Burt Chevrolet to take on Toyota after only a small investment in signs and an initial parts order, thereby relieving Toyota of the millions of man hours and billions of dollars to develop its own dealer organization, as GM did, and in which I played a significant role for 30 years.

"To put it bluntly, our own government gave Japan squatters rights to GM dealerships and blatantly violated traditional concepts of property rights. While not listed on GM financial statements as an asset, its dealer network was its biggest asset...built over a period of more than 45 years at a cost of billions of dollars. Yet our own government forced GM to surrender it to the same country that bombed Pearl Harbor less than 25 years earlier, without one dime of compensation! Subsequently, nearly all of the first 2,000 Japanese car outlets in the U.S. road 'piggy-back' on GM dealer facilities...an absolute outrage."

Consequently, Stelzer notes, GM dealerships were soon selling fewer GM cars and more Japanese cars because they were cheaper and dealer profits were greater.

I don't think I ever want to see a time when the US auto industry goes under and foreign vehicles are all we have to chose from. I am generally a conservative and don't really believe in protectionism but, if the US auto industry is going to survive something is going to have to be done. Do we really want to live in a society of consumers where we don't manufacture anything and have to rely on other countries for everything?? That is where we are headed...