03-03-08, 04:38
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Registered User
baseballlover1 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Virginia Posts: 1,400 | Re: 219mph in a Murcielago dont tell gumball there ugly... he still hast realised. 
__________________
Daniel J Wendell
| |
| |
03-03-08, 04:55
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Ari Gold
G35stilez is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Southport, CT Posts: 6,646 | Re: 219mph in a Murcielago Damn homie!
I can't imagine getting passed that fast. Not one road in my area is even close to as optimal to do such a thing (probably better off!).
edit: That fly-by is UNREAL!
__________________ 2006 DG|G Infiniti G35 Sedan | 6MT (SOLD) | |
| |
03-03-08, 07:55
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Registered User
paul34 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Orlando, FL (UCF) Posts: 1,143 | Re: 219mph in a Murcielago At those speeds he would have been traveling 19,272 feet per second.
This is 3.65 miles per second or 53.53 football fields per second.
Basically, if anything happened, they would've been dead before they would've even realized something was wrong.
I can't even begin to speak of the stupidity of this, but honestly, it was pretty ballsy to watch. And yes, I agree, that flyby was absolutely UNREAL!
And lol @ the Murcielago being ugly. Good joke there.
__________________
ONR = Optimum No Rinse
| |
| |
03-03-08, 08:46
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Concourse d'Elegance
stiffdogg06 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Columbus,Ohio Posts: 1,447 | Re: 219mph in a Murcielago When he did that fly by at 180mph. It just sounded awesome. Like a jet flying by.
But then again, thats just stupid.
__________________
Mirror Shine Brilliance of Columbus, Ohio
Turbo D Club Member #000001
| |
| |
03-03-08, 09:19
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Registered User
paul34 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Orlando, FL (UCF) Posts: 1,143 | Re: 219mph in a Murcielago Quote: |
Originally Posted by stiffdogg06 When he did that fly by at 180mph. It just sounded awesome. Like a jet flying by.
But then again, thats just stupid. | I think they later did a flyby at 219 MPH.
__________________
ONR = Optimum No Rinse
| |
| |
03-04-08, 01:47
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Registered User
jswift2000 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Monroe, CT Posts: 369 | Re: 219mph in a Murcielago I need that car - plain and simple. | |
| |
03-04-08, 05:16
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Concourse d'Elegance
stiffdogg06 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Columbus,Ohio Posts: 1,447 | Re: 219mph in a Murcielago Quote: |
Originally Posted by paul34 I think they later did a flyby at 219 MPH. |
Don't remember that one... I know they flew by a car at 211mph. But never had one of those outside camera fly by besides that 180mph one I believe. Could be wrong LoL
__________________
Mirror Shine Brilliance of Columbus, Ohio
Turbo D Club Member #000001
| |
| |
03-04-08, 06:28
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Registered User
CleanGSR is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 486 | Re: 219mph in a Murcielago Quote: |
Originally Posted by paul34 At those speeds he would have been traveling 19,272 feet per second.
This is 3.65 miles per second or 53.53 football fields per second.
Basically, if anything happened, they would've been dead before they would've even realized something was wrong.
I can't even begin to speak of the stupidity of this, but honestly, it was pretty ballsy to watch. And yes, I agree, that flyby was absolutely UNREAL!
And lol @ the Murcielago being ugly. Good joke there. | I think you've got your calculation's a little off there. 3.65 miles per second is the same as 13,140 mph. Maybe you meant 1 mile every 3.65 seconds which is still off at 986 mph. At 219mph he would cover 1 mile in 16.4 seconds or 1/4 mile at 4.1 seconds which is still pretty darn fast. | |
| |
03-04-08, 08:54
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Registered User
paul34 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Orlando, FL (UCF) Posts: 1,143 | Re: 219mph in a Murcielago Quote: |
Originally Posted by CleanGSR I think you've got your calculation's a little off there. 3.65 miles per second is the same as 13,140 mph. Maybe you meant 1 mile every 3.65 seconds which is still off at 986 mph. At 219mph he would cover 1 mile in 16.4 seconds or 1/4 mile at 4.1 seconds which is still pretty darn fast. | LOL! Talk about error, you're so right
Should be 321.19999999999824 feet per second. So almost a football field per second.
__________________
ONR = Optimum No Rinse
| |
| |
03-05-08, 12:27
|
#11 (permalink)
| | To Shine and Protect
salty is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Sask Canada Posts: 1,223 | Re: 219mph in a Murcielago That's crazy and crazy fast.
__________________
Mark
Deluxe Detailing
| |
| |
03-05-08, 11:49
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Registered User
kkreit01 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Olathe, KS Posts: 395 | Re: 219mph in a Murcielago Plain stupid. This is how innocent people die. Lambo doors belong in Civics  | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:07. | | | |