Welcome to Autopia.org.
You are viewing as a guest.
By joining our FREE community you will be able to interact with others. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today. When you join, this box is replaced with our live chat!
|
03-03-08, 05:38
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
baseballlover1 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,551
Contact: 
|
Re: 219mph in a Murcielago
dont tell gumball there ugly... he still hast realised. 
__________________
Daniel J Wendell
|
|
|
|
|
03-03-08, 05:55
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Ari Gold
G35stilez is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,711
|
Re: 219mph in a Murcielago
Damn homie!
I can't imagine getting passed that fast. Not one road in my area is even close to as optimal to do such a thing (probably better off!).
edit: That fly-by is UNREAL!
__________________
'02 Escalade
'08 Legacy
|
|
|
|
|
03-03-08, 08:55
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
paul34 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Orlando, FL (UCF)
Posts: 1,149
|
Re: 219mph in a Murcielago
At those speeds he would have been traveling 19,272 feet per second.
This is 3.65 miles per second or 53.53 football fields per second.
Basically, if anything happened, they would've been dead before they would've even realized something was wrong.
I can't even begin to speak of the stupidity of this, but honestly, it was pretty ballsy to watch. And yes, I agree, that flyby was absolutely UNREAL!
And lol @ the Murcielago being ugly. Good joke there.
__________________
ONR = Optimum No Rinse
|
|
|
|
|
03-03-08, 09:46
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Concourse d'Elegance
stiffdogg06 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,990
Contact:
|
Re: 219mph in a Murcielago
When he did that fly by at 180mph. It just sounded awesome. Like a jet flying by.
But then again, thats just stupid.
__________________
Mirror Shine Brilliance of Columbus, Ohio
Turbo D Club Member #000001
|
|
|
|
|
03-03-08, 10:19
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
paul34 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Orlando, FL (UCF)
Posts: 1,149
|
Re: 219mph in a Murcielago
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stiffdogg06
When he did that fly by at 180mph. It just sounded awesome. Like a jet flying by.
But then again, thats just stupid.
|
I think they later did a flyby at 219 MPH.
__________________
ONR = Optimum No Rinse
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-08, 02:47
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
jswift2000 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monroe, CT
Posts: 370
|
Re: 219mph in a Murcielago
I need that car - plain and simple.
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-08, 06:16
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Concourse d'Elegance
stiffdogg06 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,990
Contact:
|
Re: 219mph in a Murcielago
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by paul34
I think they later did a flyby at 219 MPH.
|
Don't remember that one... I know they flew by a car at 211mph. But never had one of those outside camera fly by besides that 180mph one I believe. Could be wrong LoL
__________________
Mirror Shine Brilliance of Columbus, Ohio
Turbo D Club Member #000001
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-08, 07:28
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
CleanGSR is online now
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 508
|
Re: 219mph in a Murcielago
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by paul34
At those speeds he would have been traveling 19,272 feet per second.
This is 3.65 miles per second or 53.53 football fields per second.
Basically, if anything happened, they would've been dead before they would've even realized something was wrong.
I can't even begin to speak of the stupidity of this, but honestly, it was pretty ballsy to watch. And yes, I agree, that flyby was absolutely UNREAL!
And lol @ the Murcielago being ugly. Good joke there.
|
I think you've got your calculation's a little off there. 3.65 miles per second is the same as 13,140 mph. Maybe you meant 1 mile every 3.65 seconds which is still off at 986 mph. At 219mph he would cover 1 mile in 16.4 seconds or 1/4 mile at 4.1 seconds which is still pretty darn fast. |
|
|
|
|
03-04-08, 09:54
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
paul34 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Orlando, FL (UCF)
Posts: 1,149
|
Re: 219mph in a Murcielago
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CleanGSR
I think you've got your calculation's a little off there. 3.65 miles per second is the same as 13,140 mph. Maybe you meant 1 mile every 3.65 seconds which is still off at 986 mph. At 219mph he would cover 1 mile in 16.4 seconds or 1/4 mile at 4.1 seconds which is still pretty darn fast.
|
LOL! Talk about error, you're so right 
Should be 321.19999999999824 feet per second. So almost a football field per second.
__________________
ONR = Optimum No Rinse
|
|
|
|
|
03-05-08, 01:27
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
To Shine and Protect
salty is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Swift Current Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 1,700
|
Re: 219mph in a Murcielago
That's crazy and crazy fast.
__________________
Mark
deluxedetailing
|
|
|
|
|
03-05-08, 12:49
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
kkreit01 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 397
|
Re: 219mph in a Murcielago
Plain stupid. This is how innocent people die.
Lambo doors belong in Civics  |
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
 Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:04. |
|
|
|
