Autopia.org - #1 auto detailing forum for car enthusiasts and professional detailers.
Autopia.org Articles, Editorial & Blogs for Car Detailing Enthusiasts Autopia Reviews: Auto Detailing Car Wax, Polish, Cleaner, Protectant Reviews Detailing Products & Supplies Catalog
Go Back   Autopia.org > CAR STYLE > Exterior & Performance


Welcome to Autopia.org.


You are viewing as a guest.  By joining our FREE community you will be able to interact with others.  Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today.   When you join, this box is replaced with our live chat!

Autopia Marketplace

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes

Old 08-02-03, 01:16   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Balucanb is offline
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 6
Contact: Send a message via Yahoo to Balucanb
under drive pulleys

Has anyone installed these on their BMW? Is so what preformance gains did you see?
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 08-02-03, 06:04   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
coolie1 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: florida
Posts: 23
i put them on my gt and got about 7 hp
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 08-02-03, 06:31   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
FalconGuy is offline
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 875
There is an interesting discussion of them on Bimmerfest.com

From what little I read about them I wont add one to my 2003, I just dont think the plus outweighs the risks.

As an aircaft technician I also would never add a cold air intake, but of course im in the minority there.

Bmw gets just about all they can out of their engines, why bother adding things that for the most point are just noisemakers.

Of course your milage may and likely will vary
__________________
On the other Hand, your dealing with an entirely different set of fingers
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 08-02-03, 11:50   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
SickOfItAll is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 140
I would never use one - too much strain on secondary systems for too little gain. I'd rather bump up to a bigger turbo and stronger fuel system.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 08-08-03, 03:15   #5 (permalink)
Obsessive Comp. Detailer
 
ahunt01's Avatar
 
ahunt01 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WV
Posts: 675
Cool he's from Germany. I can't wait to go there next year for spring break!
I wouldn't modify your BMW at all. It's already set up to kill.
__________________
2006 Limited V6 RAV4
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-03, 12:43   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
sirisaac is offline
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: colorado
Posts: 2
Hi
Balucanb,

I have one on my E36M3, and am planning on removing it. (previous owner installed it, don't recall the brand, but its the single, smaller, crank pulley). The biggest risk imho is the crank failure issue... however I have NEVER been able to find proof of this actualy occuring... always 3rd party sources. (some quite trustworthy, but still, not solid proof). There is a paper on Dinan's web site that goes into detail on this. Also as others have said, I don't like the idea of running the water pump,alternator, etc at slower speeds than they were designed to operate.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 08-14-03, 07:50   #7 (permalink)
Survey Monkey
 
IndigoGTI's Avatar
 
IndigoGTI is offline
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 433
I'm gonna go with sirissac here. If Dinan, a company that makes top notch performance parts for BMWs wouldn't produce a part that they could make tons of money off of, there is obviously a reason not to use it. From reading their white pages, I see that the crank pullies on BMW motors act as a harmonic damper. Removing this in favor of a lighter, smaller diameter pulley has the potential to do some damage. You probably wouldn't see it for a while, but the long term effects could be bad. And really, what is an extra supposed 5-7 horsepower going to do for you? You would be better off to go with a quality exhaust system like Supersprint, or Racing Dynamics, they are proven methods of making reliable horsepower. I have added the link to the Dinan white page about pullies below.

Dinan White Pages
__________________
-Chris
2001 Absolutely Red Toyota MR2 Spyder, 2003 Platinum Grey Jetta 1.8t
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 08-14-03, 05:03   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Balucanb is offline
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 6
Contact: Send a message via Yahoo to Balucanb
Thanks everyone. Let me clarify. I am not changing the Crank pulley, I agree it would be a mistake. I have the pulley set from Rogue Eng. it includes 2 pulleys, 1 for the water pump and 1 for the power steering pump, I know that it might cause problems but then again anything I add aftermarket wise might. I have also heard the stories about engine damage but so far they are all legends because I can't find anyone with 1st hand knowledge about these these things causeing damage??
IndigoGTI: I have already got a Exhaust from Eisemann, but good looking out, thanks, I also have a CAI, and am re-chiping the OBD-II in a week or so. At this point "Cheap" HP is almost non-exsistant so I will take those 4-5 if I can get'em!!!!
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 08-14-03, 05:48   #9 (permalink)
Now with twice the head
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Scottwax is offline
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 27,403
Contact: Send a message via AIM to Scottwax
Quote:
Originally posted by ejant
Smaller pulleys mean parts are going to work harder than they were designed for resulting in premature failure.
No, actually since the accessories will turn more slowly, they will last longer. You use bigger pulleys, not smaller when you just replace the accessory pulleys. When you use a smaller crank pulley, again, the belt driven accessories will turn at a slower rate.
__________________
Scott's Mobile Auto Detailing
I test for Optimum, Clearkote, Meguiars
Washing with ONR video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYOAyxsEIuQ
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 08-14-03, 10:09   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
SickOfItAll is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally posted by Scottwax
No, actually since the accessories will turn more slowly, they will last longer. You use bigger pulleys, not smaller when you just replace the accessory pulleys. When you use a smaller crank pulley, again, the belt driven accessories will turn at a slower rate.
Just because the pulleys turn slower doesn't mean that's a good thing - the water pump still needs to pump at the same rate. If car manufacturers could get more power safely from using larger pulleys, don't you think they'd do it from the factory?
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 08-15-03, 12:39   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Balucanb is offline
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 6
Contact: Send a message via Yahoo to Balucanb
Sickofitall: I really don't think it is a case of safety or doing it from the factory, The car manufactures know they could get a few more horses if they did this but the trade off is a shorter lifespan for the affected parts or a least the possibility is there, this would cost them money being a bad thing. I don't think the lifespan of the parts affected is so great that it will make a big difference, at least the bet I am making. Plus if the parts really did cause such a shortened lifespan of the affected parts I think you would hear about the problem more or the companies that sell them would either go out of biz or at least be warning the customer?
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 08-15-03, 11:41   #12 (permalink)
Registered User
 
SickOfItAll is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally posted by Balucanb
Sickofitall: I really don't think it is a case of safety or doing it from the factory, The car manufactures know they could get a few more horses if they did this but the trade off is a shorter lifespan for the affected parts or a least the possibility is there, this would cost them money being a bad thing. I don't think the lifespan of the parts affected is so great that it will make a big difference, at least the bet I am making. Plus if the parts really did cause such a shortened lifespan of the affected parts I think you would hear about the problem more or the companies that sell them would either go out of biz or at least be warning the customer?
I was addressing Scott's statement that the parts would last longer - I fully agree that they will have a shorter lifespan
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:07.


Copyright (c), 1999-2009, Autopia.org - All Rights Reserved

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65