Autopia.org - #1 auto detailing forum for car enthusiasts and professional detailers.
Autopia.org Articles, Editorial & Blogs for Car Detailing Enthusiasts Autopia Reviews: Auto Detailing Car Wax, Polish, Cleaner, Protectant Reviews Detailing Products & Supplies Catalog
Go Back   Autopia.org > CAR STYLE > Exterior & Performance


Welcome to Autopia.org.


You are viewing as a guest.  By joining our FREE community you will be able to interact with others.  Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today.   When you join, this box is replaced with our live chat!

Autopia Marketplace

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes

Old 03-16-03, 09:30   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
tradertt is offline
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore (Where we don't have a lot of brands that you guys are talking about) Help !! :D
Posts: 175
Fuel Consumption Question - Rims - Please look

Hi, I have a question which I wonder any one with experience could help answer.

If .. IF I have 2 choices of Wheel Rims ..

1) A 15 inch rim that is heavy (8kg)
2) A 16 inch Rim that is light (6kg)

Which will have a higher fuel consumption? I know that it takes effort and of course more fuel to move a rim that is of bigger size ... but with its weight into effect ... will it be offset or even have better fuel consumption than the 15 inch one?

Thank you for this silly question.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-17-03, 12:49   #2 (permalink)
Cya, & take the care eh?
 
4DSC's Avatar
 
4DSC is offline
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Ca
Posts: 5,844
Re: Fuel Consumption Question - Rims - Please look

Quote:
Originally posted by tradertt
Thank you for this silly question.
This is a complicated question!

I thought about it for a short while, and came to the conclusion that I would still go for the lighter rim (16"). While it's true that most of the mass is now further away from the center of the wheel and thus harder to rotate, I think the general goal to reduce unsprung weight is more important. Lighter wheels help the car handle and ride better than heavier ones. I know this doesn't answer your question about fuel economy, but it's something else to consider. Maybe someone with a physics degree could help figure out the rotational mass thingy?

Don't forget to consider tire weight as well. I found out that in size 235/45-17 a Kumho Ecsta 712 tire tips the scales at 27.3 lbs, while a Toyo Proxes T1-S weighs only 23.8 lbs. This is an extreme example, but since you're increasing diameter and your wheel weights are so close already, it may make a difference.
__________________
Brian
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-17-03, 01:19   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
tradertt is offline
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore (Where we don't have a lot of brands that you guys are talking about) Help !! :D
Posts: 175
I have thought of it b4 .. because due to inertia the higher the unsprung weight the more it takes to get the car to move off which is directly related to your fuel consumption.

If there is a bigger rim diameter, the weight is spread out further thus more force is needed to make it start rolling ... but the weight could have a direct impact on it ...

Sometimes it makes me wonder if its worth while getting a RIM that is ultra light - OZ - or getting a heavier rim which is much cheaper. Wonder how much fuel will I save in the end ...

ANyone care to help
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-17-03, 10:41   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Lowejackson's Avatar
 
Lowejackson is offline
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,870
Wonder how much fuel will I save in the end ...

Fuel savings – negligible

Handling changes – could be high, depending on the car, suspension setup etc

The issues you are talking about are interesting but in comparison to the mass of the car mass and engine efficiency, they are minor. In a race car setup, weight is critical for speed and handling but not for fuel consumption.

The biggest difference you can make is with the use of the accelerator peddle and driving style


Steven
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-17-03, 11:04   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
tradertt is offline
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore (Where we don't have a lot of brands that you guys are talking about) Help !! :D
Posts: 175
I have always heard people claim that they got heavy rims are it is affecting their fuel consumption ..

Quote:
Hi my comment is don't take taiwan rims if you can...very heavy ah...the end result is increase fuel consumption and sluggish for our car...me running on taiwan rims now..regret...that time should pay a bit more about 500 to get those light weight type...think in the long run and you will find the money well spent..Stamford got quite a range...go there see the model and then you can compare the prices elsewhere
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-17-03, 11:11   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
tradertt is offline
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore (Where we don't have a lot of brands that you guys are talking about) Help !! :D
Posts: 175
Quote:
Outside of size considerations, the weight of the rim deserves special mention. Heavier wheels means slower acceleration and larger wheel diameter usually means heavier weight. Though the information is hard to come by, comparing wheel weight is a good way to choose the right wheel. Chrome wheels tend to be significantly more expensive than their non-chromed versions of the same wheel.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-17-03, 11:40   #7 (permalink)
Now with twice the head
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Scottwax is offline
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 27,393
Contact: Send a message via AIM to Scottwax
Fuel savings won't be much provided the overall diameter of the wheels with the tires mounted are the same, but acceleration should improve a bit. I've seen dyno tests where heavier wheel/tire combos lagged 3-6 hp less on acceleration than lighter combinations. Once the vehicle is at a static speed, the hp is the same, which would lead me to believe that fuel consumption is also similar.

Motor Trend tested wheels on a Civic and some of the heavier set ups slowed the car by .4 in 0-60 and 1/4 mile runs, so go with the lighter set up.
__________________
Scott's Mobile Auto Detailing
I test for Optimum, Clearkote, Meguiars
Washing with ONR video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYOAyxsEIuQ
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-17-03, 12:11   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
tradertt is offline
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore (Where we don't have a lot of brands that you guys are talking about) Help !! :D
Posts: 175
Have a look at my car .. this is my problem ...

Please advice. I forgot to check my tire specs but I believe its either

175/70R14
185/65R14

How can I fill up the gap ... what sort of rims can I change to ? Would it adversly affect my fuel consumption?

The wheels looks very small with a ugly gap between the tires and the body of the car ...
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-17-03, 12:13   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
tradertt is offline
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore (Where we don't have a lot of brands that you guys are talking about) Help !! :D
Posts: 175
See how small it looks when it compares to the whole car.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-17-03, 02:45   #10 (permalink)
Overhaulin>Pimp my Ride
 
Jake11375's Avatar
 
Jake11375 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 635
Hey Tradertt....

I have a 95 honda civic and I had the same wheel gap problem like your car. My OEM wheel size is "14" with 185/60/14 tires. I plus sized to 16X7 rims with 205/45/16 tires. Now that it has been mentioned here I have noticed a drop in MPG but it is only about 1-2 mpg. Before, I would get about 37 mpg, now I get around 35. Believe me the trade is well worth the plus size as far as cosmetics. Perhaps an even greater concern would be ride comfort if you go too big. The bigger the rim the smaller the sidewall, thus less cushion. But, this can be countered with softer springs/struts and the right choice in tire. Good luck!
__________________
'95 Honda Civic EX Coupe, Granada Black Pearl
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-17-03, 03:51   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
thomasfl's Avatar
 
thomasfl is offline
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 362
I agree that your car will look much better with bigger wheels, I didn't notice until you mentioned it though.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-17-03, 06:41   #12 (permalink)
Cya, & take the care eh?
 
4DSC's Avatar
 
4DSC is offline
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Ca
Posts: 5,844
I've been told that if you have a large wheel gap, moving up to larger diameter rims will only make it look worse because you have to maintain the same overall diameter and the increased empty/dead space in between the hub and the outer rim will make the gap look bigger, giving you a "4x4" look... Just my 2nd hand info.
__________________
Brian
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:38.


Copyright (c), 1999-2009, Autopia.org - All Rights Reserved

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65