Autopia.org - #1 auto detailing forum for car enthusiasts and professional detailers.
Autopia.org Articles, Editorial & Blogs for Car Detailing Enthusiasts Autopia Reviews: Auto Detailing Car Wax, Polish, Cleaner, Protectant Reviews Detailing Products & Supplies Catalog
Go Back   Autopia.org > CAR DETAILING & FINISH CARE > ECO Friendly Car Detailing


Welcome to Autopia.org.


You are viewing as a guest.  By joining our FREE community you will be able to interact with others.  Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today.   When you join, this box is replaced with our live chat!

Autopia Marketplace

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes

Old 06-26-08, 11:12   #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
MobileJay's Avatar
 
MobileJay is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,189
Re: Target's "Eco" Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by Denzil View Post
So how about that Target Eco Line?
LOL. I think we will have to wait till eyezack87 puts up his reviews on it.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-26-08, 08:47   #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
slowsilvy is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 17
Re: Target's "Eco" Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew.haynes View Post
I personally think we should be responsible "stewards" of our planet. I consider humans to be the single most important thing on the earth - no other animal or aspect of the environment. That being said, I think the best interests of HUMANS should always be considered first. However, I think it is responsible of us not to cause unnecessary damage. IF/WHEN there are ways to lessen damage on the environment, without a great cost to humans, why NOT? However, when people start sacrificing the rights, freedoms, and quality of living of human beings for the betterment of animals or the environment, I have a problem with that.

I agree with you 110%.
__________________
02 silverado RCSB 5.3L
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-09, 08:00   #15 (permalink)
Banned
 
Relaited is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 115
Re: Target's "Eco" Line

Wow, I believe those who are posting against this could nto be more wrong. If you are in So California, you will not have a choice.

I wish I were in Texas, at lest from a business point of view, it would be easy pickins to grow my business there. It is easy here, I can't imagine how easy it would be with this thinking!

-jim
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-09-09, 06:37   #16 (permalink)
Registered G110 User
 
craigdt is offline
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 846
Re: Target's "Eco" Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by EOppie View Post
The microfibers say they are bamboo...feel soft like my sheets!
So they cut down bamboo to make towels out of? That doesnt sound too earth friendly to me.. I just have never understood that
__________________
Polish Cut Levels Chart
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-09, 03:28   #17 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Poordude is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 92
Re: Target's "Eco" Line

I work for a chemical manufacturing company that manufacters "GREEN CERTIFIED" chemicals. There is a ton of eco-babble out there & be careful...buyer beware. There is a ton of false claims being made on green products & they are skirting the issue with wording & labelling. If a product does not have green seal(usa) or ECP (canada) certification on the label it ain,t green. Many many over the counter cleaning products claim to be enviromentally friendly but doing a search on the raw materials they use will shock you.
Scorecard Home
i have been into selling "green" chemicals before green was the thing to do.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-09-09, 06:39   #18 (permalink)
Registered User
 
08StangGT is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 40
Re: Target's "Eco" Line

craigdt, I assume bamboo won't grow in Kansas. It grows FAST! And establishes easily. I am sure in more tropical climates than NC, you can get several crops of bamboo each year. A few years ago Bamboo was all the rage for flooring because it replenishes so much faster than wood.
__________________
08 Mustang GT Convertible, Dark Candy Apple Red
99 Acura TL, Black (Daily Driver)
99 Ford Ranger, Cardinal Red (My "Home Depot Truck")
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-09, 08:22   #19 (permalink)
Registered G110 User
 
craigdt is offline
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 846
Re: Target's "Eco" Line

Indeed! you learn something everyday.
I suppose if it is akin to some of the other such things that look similar, it would be
pretty feisty and grow fast.

Thanks for the educated reply. I thenceforth retract all biased comments pertaining
to bamboo towels
__________________
Polish Cut Levels Chart
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-09, 03:24   #20 (permalink)
Registered User
 
DeanMachine's Avatar
 
DeanMachine is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: northern california
Posts: 68
Re: Target's "Eco" Line

Post whore here trying to build up my post count and thought I`d chime in.
Truly being green "and" owning a car can only be achieved (detailing related) by not washing your car at all. I am all for trying the ONR as it will save water, but how much water was used to manufacture that bottle of (insert any name) chemical (let alone the chemical) itself. I am on the saving water band wagon and would actually like to see more eco - friendly manufacturing processes and chemicals being made and used. But using the term "Green" feels almost slight. How about "water conscious"?
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-09, 03:44   #21 (permalink)
Administrator
 
DavidB's Avatar
 
DavidB is offline
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Autopia... Where else!
Posts: 7,522
Contact: Send a message via Yahoo to DavidB
Social: View member's Facebook page
Re: Target's "Eco" Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanMachine View Post
Post whore here trying to build up my post count and thought I`d chime in.
Truly being green "and" owning a car can only be achieved (detailing related) by not washing your car at all. I am all for trying the ONR as it will save water, but how much water was used to manufacture that bottle of (insert any name) chemical (let alone the chemical) itself. I am on the saving water band wagon and would actually like to see more eco - friendly manufacturing processes and chemicals being made and used. But using the term "Green" feels almost slight. How about "water conscious"?
I understand what you're saying, but perhaps the bigger point is being missed. So let me post my point of view, which is shared by most people in the waterless wash business.

Car washing is a major consumer of clean water. In the USA alone, there are an estimated 3 billion commercial car washes a year and as many as 2.25 billion home car washes a year. The combined fresh water consumption is estimated to be in excess of 32 billion gallons per year. This enormous consumption of fresh water is caused by an inefficient car washing process that has been permitted by poor regulations or poor enforcement of regulations (i.e., EPA Clean Water Act).

Until recently, all car washing processes were based on the use of water pressure to remove dirt and cleaners from the surface of a vehicle. Although this method of cleaning is very inefficient (in terms of both time and water resources), social and regulatory pressures have had very little impact on the car washing industry and individual habits. With new clean water regulations in California, Florida and other states, this is all about to change.

Social and economic development throughout the world requires a ready supply of fresh water. More than 90% of the total water demand comes from irrigation for agricultural purposes and industry. The water used in traditional car wash methods is wasted because it is not part of a productive process that improves the quality of life.

So, implementation of any wash system that reduces water use and surface water pollution is a HUGE benefit. You may not think of it as "GREEN" because the best process has not yet been shown to the market. There are better ways than what we have seen so far, but the industry as a whole is making good progress.
__________________
Autopia.org Mayor At-Large
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-09, 04:06   #22 (permalink)
Registered User
 
DeanMachine's Avatar
 
DeanMachine is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: northern california
Posts: 68
Re: Target's "Eco" Line

I think my post was mis read. I am 100% for LESS water usage. I was just pointing out the severity of our water abuse in this country. I am in no way saying I am not guilty, or that waterless technology isn`t a step in the right direction, just that along with waterless car products we can carry a bigger impact with other eco friendly products and procedures. I am very happy to see that this Autopian community I am now a part of shares my views.
Thanks for the info on water usage related to car washing. It is really quite disturbing once you stop and realize how spoiled we are. Chris Rock touched on this. He pointed out how tap water isn`t good enough to drink, that we need bottled water. Where , in other countries, they don`t have such a luxury and water is much more sparce. I won`t go into details of his skit, as I am not sure it is appropriate for this thread, but he says it is called "tap" water because it is only good for certain things.
So all in all I think we are on the same page and I was just trying to bring a realated topic to the table.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-09, 04:55   #23 (permalink)
Administrator
 
DavidB's Avatar
 
DavidB is offline
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Autopia... Where else!
Posts: 7,522
Contact: Send a message via Yahoo to DavidB
Social: View member's Facebook page
Re: Target's "Eco" Line

Great discussion and I think it is worth keeping the heat on for people to change their ways. I'm guilty as can be -- Strike that -- Guilty as charged! However, can can proudly say that I have not washed by cars by conventional method for more than 3 months now, and I am completely happy with how they look and how much faster I get the job done.
__________________
Autopia.org Mayor At-Large
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-09, 05:21   #24 (permalink)
Registered User
 
DeanMachine's Avatar
 
DeanMachine is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: northern california
Posts: 68
Re: Target's "Eco" Line

I am actually amazed at how much I have learned in the past 2 months with regards to detailing and to conservation in this trade/hobby. I am an hvac tech and deal with being enviro-friendly on a daily basis with refrigerants and energy consumption. I am going to be doing detailing as a small weekend venture and hope to pass these "Green" (ha ha) tips to my son and family members as well as future customers. Like you said DavidB, the more pressure (and knowledge) the more "mainstream" this will become. I find a lot of resistance and or hesitation when it comes to offering a waterless car washing. Then again, I was on that side at one point. Proof is in the puddin`!
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:50.


Copyright (c), 1999-2009, Autopia.org - All Rights Reserved

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65