07-03-07, 09:34
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Registered User
PhaRO is offline
Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 381 | ONR Scratch TEST I have used ONR and similar no rinse washes for almost 2 years now. My initial uses in my mobile business were partial cleanings (top surfaces) with occasional full cleanings. I did this almost secretly for fear that someone would freak out. After a year or so I had total confidence in the product. Scott who has used no rinse products for many years was a big inspiration for me to start using it all of the time. About 7 months ago I came out of the closet so to speak. With no water restrictions or enforcement in my city my only reason to use ONR is that it works. It not only does it's job, I personally feel using ONR results in a better looking car and an overall cleaner car. I've cleaned over 20,000 cars using traditional methods which is more than enough to base my feeling on.
The two most often things I read that concern people about ONR is that it won't clean as well and it will causing scratches and marring. As for the cleaning on cars that are washed 1-4 weeks it does a fantastic job. Since there are no suds you can see exactly what you are cleaning. There are no missed spots that are discovered when you are rinsing or drying the car. Basically if you can see you can clean it. Today I wanted to come up with a test that you could use to see if ONR scratched. Several have posted pictures of panels they have been washed with ONR for months and have little or no marring. Truthfully I think it's impossible to clean a car repeatedly (especially commercially) and never mar the paint. The goal for me is to reduce the likelihood of marring or scratching the paint as much as I can within the parameters of time and money. Enough babbling and onto the test.
A new dvdr was used. The two black lines were for me to reference so I could go in the same direction. Some lint or fuzz shows on the dvdr.
I filled a bowl with about 6 quarts of water and 2 caps of ONR (1oz)
I wanted to create some gritty dirt so I ground some peppercorn and sprinkle salt on the wet cd.
I used a corded MF wash mitt which has been used quiet a bit but was just washed. I wiped the dvdr twice. Once basically removed the grit and the second time moved the grit in the mitt across the dvdr. I rewet the dvdr in the ONR mix and repeated. I did this 3 times.
I didn't get a mf towel when I grab the mitt from my truck so I blew off most of the remaining water to see the dvdr and no scratches were present. Some lint, fuzz or water shows on the dvdr.  | |
| |
07-03-07, 09:40
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Registered User
mblgjr is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 691 | Re: ONR Scratch TEST Thanks for sharing.
I didn't know that the ONR doesn't suds up at all. Does it really sheet clean well enough that you don't have to dry the car like you normally would? | |
| |
07-03-07, 09:45
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Registered User
PhaRO is offline
Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 381 | Re: ONR Scratch TEST Quote: |
Originally Posted by mblgjr Thanks for sharing.
I didn't know that the ONR doesn't suds up at all. Does it really sheet clean well enough that you don't have to dry the car like you normally would? | It doesn't sud at all. You do have to dry the car with towels. It does dry very easily especially if you wring the excess water out of the wash mitt. I didn't dry the dvd during the test because my good towels were stored in my truck and I didn't feel like going out to get one. | |
| |
07-03-07, 09:46
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Now with twice the head
Scottwax is offline
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Arlington, TX Posts: 24,937 | Re: ONR Scratch TEST Quote: |
Originally Posted by mblgjr Thanks for sharing.
I didn't know that the ONR doesn't suds up at all. Does it really sheet clean well enough that you don't have to dry the car like you normally would? | Not sure where you got that bit of information. You have to dry the car as you go along. Wash a section, dry it and move on.
__________________
Owner, Scott's Mobile Auto Detailing
I test for Optimum, Clearkote and Meguiars
| |
| |
07-03-07, 09:47
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Now with twice the head
Scottwax is offline
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Arlington, TX Posts: 24,937 | Re: ONR Scratch TEST Nice test!
I agree with you, unless a car is caked in mud, I can do a better job washing with ONR than traditional car wash soap and a hose. Faster too.
__________________
Owner, Scott's Mobile Auto Detailing
I test for Optimum, Clearkote and Meguiars
| |
| |
07-03-07, 09:57
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Registered User
BaseSteala112 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 132 | Re: ONR Scratch TEST I agree, nice test man. | |
| |
07-03-07, 10:02
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Super_Herb is offline
Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 94 | Re: ONR Scratch TEST Well, I know now that if my car somehow gets covered in freshly ground pepper on my way to work, ONR will clean it marr free!
Oh, and I use ONR and love it.......and I have cleaned off plenty of Lowry's seasoning salt, garlic powder, and freshly cut oregano off my car with great scratch free results.
Seriously....ONR does work great. | |
| |
07-03-07, 11:17
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Registered User
optimusp517 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Redmond - WA Posts: 371 | Re: ONR Scratch TEST I have to agree I got done with my car in about an hour and I did a pretty careful job. If I did a typical job it would probably take 1.5 hour and I honestly feel that ONR helps me clean the car better than a convention soap and mitt where there's possible marring.. | |
| |
07-03-07, 11:59
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Banned
WilliamHBonney is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: USA!!! Posts: 1,416 | Re: ONR Scratch TEST Very nice! | |
| |
07-04-07, 04:29
|
#10 (permalink)
| | "That ball wasn't low"
blkZ28Conv is offline
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: VIR Road Course, Va Posts: 5,685 | Re: ONR Scratch TEST A more viable test would be to tape a CD on the side or top of your truck and allow "real" world grime and sun bonded material (sap) to attach itself to the CD. Then perform your test.
Actually your peppercorn test is a good example why "I" perform only full washes. Your dirt (peppercorn) is the stuff I prefer to "rinse off" prior to touching "my" vehicles with any cleaning solution and utensils.
The remaining washing steps are identical for both waterless and a full wash. The full wash adds another safety step by concluding with a full rinse. These 2 rinsing steps are important to me in alleviating the major causes of paint damaging when cleaning a finish.
This is not to say a waterless wash doesn't create a credible alternative and does a satisfactory job at cleaning exposed areas, but a full wash IMO has a larger margin of safety and performs the task better.
Call me old school and with 45 years of washing vehicles, I still see no reason to change to this type of method unless a situation calls for such (water restriction & commercially detailing with plans to polish after washing).
Call me crazy but I enjoy caring for my vehicles and occasional $$ details. A full wash is the only means that "I" receive full satisfaction as part of the car care session.
I have just not reached this stage as a hobbyist to short-cut this important step in detailing.
__________________ 04 Millennium Yellow Z06 (Zaino'd)
Zaino beta tester
"To make one's vehicle shine. You must put in the time". | |
| |
07-04-07, 06:45
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Flight Sim. addict!!
bigfoot is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Juncos, Puerto Rico Posts: 859 | Re: ONR Scratch TEST I think this test is great! It will definetly eliminate a lot of doubts that people have concerning thet scratching that it might do. Great test, Pharo!
__________________
Control Tower to Airplane: AP123, Please do not exceed 250 kts below 10,000 Ft, please acknowledge... | |
| |
07-04-07, 06:47
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Registered User
BlackElantraGT is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: SoCal Posts: 1,898 | Re: ONR Scratch TEST blkZ28Conv, you bring up a lot of points that I agree with when it comes to ONR.
I like and use ONR, but I don't see myself ever switching completely unless we were placed on some kind of water restriction. Since SoCal hardly saw any rain this year, I wouldn't be surprised if this were to happen sooner than many of us would want.
Many of us (I hope) take showers daily. Imagine if all you could do was wipe yourself down at the end of the day with as many baby wipes as you needed. Sure, you might feel fresh for a little while, but eventually you'll want and need a real shower. That's basically what ONR is when compared to a conventional wash.
I know most are concerned more about marring from an ONR wash, but my problem with it is its lack of cleaning power against certain contamination such as bird bombs and pollen. I literally have to scrub, with more pressure than I'd like, to get contamination like this off, if it even comes off at all. It's not my process, it's not the wash media, it's ONR itself that's not doing the job that a regular wash would easily take care of. Unless you're claying and polishing a car afterwards all the time, I don't see how some of you can never encounter a problem with your ONR solution being much weaker than conventional soap.
Also, I'd like to point out that 6 quarts of water = 1.5 gallons. Based on the pic, that bowl does not look anywhere near 1.5 gallons of water. If you added 1 fl oz to this bowl, your ONR wash in this test is many times more concentrated than what a normal ONR wash would be. Plus, if your substitute dirt particles in this case was salt and peppercorn, you wouldn't even need a wash media. All you'd have to do is dip the CD in the solution, and most, if not all of it would fall off. | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:12. | | | |