Autopia.org - #1 auto detailing forum for car enthusiasts and professional detailers.
Autopia.org Articles, Editorial & Blogs for Car Detailing Enthusiasts Autopia Reviews: Auto Detailing Car Wax, Polish, Cleaner, Protectant Reviews Detailing Products & Supplies Catalog
Go Back   Autopia.org > CAR STYLE > Click & Brag


Welcome to Autopia.org.


You are viewing as a guest.  By joining our FREE community you will be able to interact with others.  Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today.   When you join, this box is replaced with our live chat!

Autopia Marketplace

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes

Old 06-18-03, 09:38   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
joed1228 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 2,006
Unhappy I bought a Sony 5 MP camera and I'm not happy with the pictures, why?

I just bought a Sony DSC-P92 5 MP camera, took me a few months to make up my mind and I thought I was getting one of the best units but I don't like the way the pictures are coming out.

I am resting the camera on a table to make sure the unit is as still as can be, the camera is taking pic's at 5 MP all the time but I don't feel they are as sharp/crisp as they ought to be. I even tried taking a picture of one item and trying all kinds of options on the camera, nothing helped. I am going to try to view the pictures is Adobe Photoshop and see if the veiwer I am using is junk.

My brother told me it may be because they are in .jpeg format, not the raw format in which the camera captures them.

Is there anything I can do or is a 5 MP camera only a wee bit better than the 3 MP units? I do know from 3 to 4 MP is barely anything, I thought 5 MP would be a huge jump.

Help me out guys I don't know what I should be expecting of this unit and what I can do within the camera to make the pictures better.
__________________
Boston, MA auto detailer.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-03, 09:41   #2 (permalink)
Come on! Fhqwhgads!!
 
Jngrbrdman's Avatar
 
Jngrbrdman is offline
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: -Salt Lake City- Former Deputy Dawg
Posts: 6,022
Contact: Send a message via AIM to Jngrbrdman Send a message via Yahoo to Jngrbrdman
The difference I've seen in the higher MP cameras (I've only got a 2.1 MP camera myself) is the quality of image when you focus on an object that is really close. How does it do in that regard? I know mine is pretty crappy at focusing on objects really close to me. I've been impressed from time to time, but not nearly as often as the higher MP cameras. It works for my purposes though.
__________________
Obsessive Compulsive Detailing shouldn't be cured....
...it should be Encouraged!
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-03, 09:47   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
dookiebob's Avatar
 
dookiebob is offline
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 107
Contact: Send a message via AIM to dookiebob
If you can take the pics in TIFF format, you will have the best resolution. The JPEG compression on the Sony cameras is pretty fierce.

I believe there is a way to adjust the level of JPEG compression on the newer cameras, but I'll have to ask my GF about it. She just got a DSC-V1... and I have to use my lowly DSC-S70 (3MP). My camera doesn't give the option to adjust the level other than a few modes

-Bob
__________________
2002 Midnight Black Swirl (I mean, Pearl) WRX
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-03, 09:48   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
joed1228 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 2,006
If I want to blow the picture up the quality stays exactly the same, I can even zoom in on one part of the picture and it'll stay the same (quality wise).

Can I see some of your 2.1 MP pictures? I would like to compare them to my camera and see if just maybe I was expecting the world from this camera. Is my quality supposed to be the same as real film?
__________________
Boston, MA auto detailer.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-03, 09:51   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
joed1228 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 2,006
If you can find out how to take TIFF format pictures for me that would be awesome, I am kind of lost here, reading the manual as we speak.
__________________
Boston, MA auto detailer.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-03, 09:51   #6 (permalink)
Come on! Fhqwhgads!!
 
Jngrbrdman's Avatar
 
Jngrbrdman is offline
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: -Salt Lake City- Former Deputy Dawg
Posts: 6,022
Contact: Send a message via AIM to Jngrbrdman Send a message via Yahoo to Jngrbrdman
All of the pics in my gallery except for the floating Porsche badge one were taken with my 2.1. The pics in the link in my sig were with the 2.1 as well. There are a few in my gallery that are really close shots, like the one of my sideskirts with the carbon fiber vinyl on them, that turned out very well. Those are the times I'm surprised that it actually focused on what I wanted to take a picture of. lol I've been happy enough with my 2.1 that the cost for a 5 MP just doesn't do it for me. I've got some very nice film cameras that I use when I take serious photographs. The digicam is just for cars and things like that. I've been pleased.
__________________
Obsessive Compulsive Detailing shouldn't be cured....
...it should be Encouraged!
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-03, 09:56   #7 (permalink)
Administrator
 
DavidB's Avatar
 
DavidB is offline
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Autopia... Where else!
Posts: 7,528
Contact: Send a message via Yahoo to DavidB
Social: View member's Facebook page
I have 3 SONY digicams and love them all. My most recent is the DSC-F707, which took me a while to learn how to use. What I finally figured out is that I have to record at a lower resolution for close up work. This works for me, as I take a lot of close up pics that get cropped and sized down anyway.

When I'm taking car pics outside, I can crank up the resolution, make sure the shutter speed is right and set the light levels, then the pic come out looking crisp and clear.

db
__________________
Autopia.org Mayor At-Large
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-03, 09:58   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
SpeedSolutions is offline
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 46
Contact: Send a message via AIM to SpeedSolutions
Quote:
Originally posted by dookiebob
If you can take the pics in TIFF format, you will have the best resolution. The JPEG compression on the Sony cameras is pretty fierce.

I believe there is a way to adjust the level of JPEG compression on the newer cameras, but I'll have to ask my GF about it. She just got a DSC-V1... and I have to use my lowly DSC-S70 (3MP). My camera doesn't give the option to adjust the level other than a few modes

-Bob
Bob, I've got a Sony CD400 with 4 MP and it has the option to change through about 5 different formats and TIFF is one of them. I've never used it, but I can promise you it will be the first thing on my to do list tomorrow. Can you explain to me what the difference is from TIFF to JPEG and so on? Thanks a ton!


Joed, like I said above, I've got the CD400 that has 4MP. Here's a couple pictures I took recently of my car. If you want to see them in 1600x1200 resolution(which I recommend you do), just add ".orig.jpg" to the existing URL of the picture you want blown up.

http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...2/fbed84f8.jpg

http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...a/fbed84fe.jpg



Hope this helps.

Brandon

Edit: Pictures work now!

Last edited by SpeedSolutions : 06-18-03 at 10:41.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-03, 10:01   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
dookiebob's Avatar
 
dookiebob is offline
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 107
Contact: Send a message via AIM to dookiebob
Here are some pics of my cousin's G35 and my friend's Accord that I detailed:

http://www.imagestation.com/album/?id=4289911123

If you click on the images, you can see them in their 3MP glory. All pictures were taken as JPEG format.

-Bob
__________________
2002 Midnight Black Swirl (I mean, Pearl) WRX
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-03, 10:01   #10 (permalink)
Lexus Lover
 
Mmmph's Avatar
 
Mmmph is offline
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: N. Cackalacky
Posts: 496
I bought the Sony DSC-F707 in December 2001. It is a great camera with a macro feature. I can get really close.

I shoot in .jpg standard 2560x1920. I get 85-90 pics on a 128MB Memory stick.

I love this camera at any focal length!

__________________
My car is cleaner than yours!
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-03, 10:08   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
dookiebob's Avatar
 
dookiebob is offline
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 107
Contact: Send a message via AIM to dookiebob
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmph
I bought the Sony DSC-F707 in December 2001. It is a great camera with a macro feature. I can get really close.

I shoot in .jpg standard 2560x1920. I get 85-90 pics on a 128MB Memory stick.

I love this camera at any focal length!

Mmmph...

I love that pic ... but there is quite a bit of JPEG compression in the background. The clarity of the pigeon itself is pretty impressive though.

-Bob
__________________
2002 Midnight Black Swirl (I mean, Pearl) WRX
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-03, 10:14   #12 (permalink)
Registered User
 
2hotford's Avatar
 
2hotford is offline
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Can
Posts: 694
Hey!
Sometimes the software that comes with the camera is not that great. Use Photoshop, and blow up the picture to its actual size. It should be very sharp! If not, do you have some type of manual settings that could be producing a blury image? Try and email Sony and ask. There is probably a button somewhere that is either engaged and shouldn't be or vice versa.

Here is a pic my wife took of her flowers off our deck. This was shot with a 4 Mp Canon G3:
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:01.


Copyright (c), 1999-2009, Autopia.org - All Rights Reserved

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65