05-06-08, 10:01
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Up Theyah for the Summah
themightytimmah is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 3,176
|
Re: Low-Budget Sleeper Cars
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Fermani
My vote is for a 5.0 with a large hidden shot of N0S. Stock cam ones can go 10'ohs all day long. You won't know what hit ya.
|
Happened to me once, on a bridge. I thought I had him beat until I saw the slicks on the back 2 tires  .
__________________
Once you buff black, you never go back
|
|
|
|
05-07-08, 04:26
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
member from the old board
tom p. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: boston
Posts: 3,183
|
Re: Low-Budget Sleeper Cars
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkie
Tell me if i forgotten any..
|
Mr. Darkie, are most of these car available and familiar to people in the USA and Canada 
|
|
|
|
05-07-08, 08:40
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Autopia Fire/Rescue/EMS
DaGonz is offline
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marlborough, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,715
|
Re: Low-Budget Sleeper Cars
My Mom owned a sleeper car back in the mid to late 1970's. Her 1969 Plymouth Fury 3 was totalled when a drunk plowed into it while parked. She went out and bought herself a 1972 Chevelle.. 4 doors, brown metallic paint with a vinyl roof. It was a smaller car than her Fury, and she couldn't understand why it got worse gas mileage.
Perhaps it had something to do with the 427 under the hood... 
__________________
The Stable... 2007 Ford Edge, 2006 Ford Mustang GT, 2001 Ford F150 4x4 Supercrew, 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2001 Ford Mustang
|
|
|
|
05-07-08, 10:32
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
2002 Z06 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wildwood, MO
Posts: 139
|
Re: Low-Budget Sleeper Cars
um......wow
|
|
|
|
05-07-08, 06:40
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
Sir Velveeta
Frito Bandito is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Odessa, TX
Posts: 411
|
Re: Low-Budget Sleeper Cars
I always liked 80s turbo Regals personally.
|
|
|
|
05-12-08, 08:07
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
Now with twice the head
Scottwax is offline
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 24,708
|
Re: Low-Budget Sleeper Cars
Quote:
Originally Posted by fstb88
There are only three sleepers in my mind. One would be and early 90s Thunderbird with the SC or the Second Gen Ford Taurus SHO, with a slight mod(sv heads and cams off a SVT Contour) it can pull major power without turbo or superchargers. Little bit of an extensive build but will be very solid. O and the late 80s turbo charged T-Birds
|
Those aren't sleepers to someone who knows cars though. Sleeper, IMO, are cars that had no performance aspirations stock. That's why the Malibu/Caddy engine combo works so well.
Hot Rod once did an article about a twin turbo'ed 350 stuff into a Rambler. Now that's a sleeper!
__________________
Owner, Scott's Mobile Auto Detailing
I test for Optimum, Clearkote and Meguiars
|
|
|
|
05-12-08, 09:50
|
#31 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Asad_A203 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Winterpeg
Posts: 80
|
Re: Low-Budget Sleeper Cars
3000GT VR4 FTW. With a downpipe and a boost controller; you should be pushing around 400 H.P on a car that will probably cost 14k.
__________________
___________________________
DG G35 Coupe -> 19s PIAA Super Rozza
Bats Overlays, 35% tint, Kuruma Z front Bumper Coming Soon!
|
|
|
|
05-13-08, 05:52
|
#32 (permalink)
|
|
U Bring It - I Bling It
David Fermani is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 2,729
|
Re: Low-Budget Sleeper Cars
A sleeper to me is something that looks and sound weak. We had a sleeper Mustang back in the early 90's and we use to pick on all the trailer cars. We'd beg them for a 10 car spot (with the leave) and they'd never catch up. Most of the time we'd shut the car down early and never run it all the way out. Then run it back for double of nothing. People always thought we were bringing a knife to a gun fight until they had to pay up.
__________________
The Perfection is in the Reflection
|
|
|
|
05-14-08, 04:38
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
C25A1guy is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Arcadia, CA
Posts: 3
|
Re: Low-Budget Sleeper Cars
That reminds me. i used to use the trannies from the Regal GS on my old civic and integra drag projects. Send the trans off the level 10 for their rebuild service, strap it onto a B-series with a bell housing adapter. Never had to worry about transmission issues ever again and never had to lift for the rest of the quarter mile.
But I did somewhat get crucified by many in the Honda/Acura community for doing so, but it worked so I never bothered to listen.
|
|
|
|
05-14-08, 09:13
|
#34 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
victory is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 401
|
Re: Low-Budget Sleeper Cars
Quote:
Originally Posted by C25A1guy
That reminds me. i used to use the trannies from the Regal GS on my old civic and integra drag projects. Send the trans off the level 10 for their rebuild service, strap it onto a B-series with a bell housing adapter. Never had to worry about transmission issues ever again and never had to lift for the rest of the quarter mile.
But I did somewhat get crucified by many in the Honda/Acura community for doing so, but it worked so I never bothered to listen.
|
Gotta get them built though. Once we start pushing mid to low 13's in the regal we cook stock trannies pretty regularly. Bigger car though with a lot more torque
|
|
|
|
05-24-08, 09:19
|
#35 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
soccer6planet is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Louisville,KY
Posts: 6
|
Re: Low-Budget Sleeper Cars
Didn't chevy make an avalanche with an 8.1 liter engine? possible slleper especially for a big truck
|
|
|
|
05-24-08, 10:32
|
#36 (permalink)
|
|
Practical Perfectionist
Accumulator is offline
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 19,694
|
Re: Low-Budget Sleeper Cars
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottwax
..the Mazda 626 GT, turbo engine like the Ford Probe, total stealth machine.
|
Accumulatorette had one of those before she switched to Audis. Very cool little ride (and bulletproof reliability- just fluids, filters, and lots of tires  for a very hard ~95K miles), but the torquesteer was brutal, even with stock power levels, even at a pretty good roll..
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:44. |
|
|
|