| Welcome to the Autopia.org. You are viewing as a guest. By joining our FREE community you will be able to interact with others. Plus, when you join you will receive instant coupon codes for special discounts with our sponsors. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
|
02-26-08, 04:27
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Registered User
WhenISayJump is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 27 | Chrysler going green? What do you guys think of Chrysler going green (biofuel and flexfuel)with some of there vehicles like the Chrysler Sebring or like the Dodge Ram ? | |
| |
02-26-08, 04:41
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Not too old to learn.
RTexasF is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Brownsville TX Posts: 771 | Re: Chrysler going green? Zowie, I'm not impressed. | |
| |
02-26-08, 10:00
|
#3 (permalink)
| | No prep, no pride!
a.k.a. Patrick is offline
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca Posts: 4,517 | Re: Chrysler going green? Get use to it, its going to happen folks, it really has to......I have a CNG (compressed natural gas) Chevy 2500 at work that really has some power, but lacks a little in overall single tank mileage. Ive been driving a CNG truck for about 7 years now, and the technology has come a long way. Went from a Ford F250 to the Chevy 2500 and theres quite a difference.
I also own a Ford FlexFuel which my son drives ('00 Taurus).
__________________ Owner Excel Detail & Car Care Products. Just an enthusiastic detailer, providing professional services.
You-Dee-M'er... | |
| |
02-26-08, 11:52
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Registered User
paul34 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Orlando, FL (UCF) Posts: 1,148 | Re: Chrysler going green? Neither are really "green" technologies unless we're talking biodiesel here...
__________________
ONR = Optimum No Rinse
| |
| |
02-27-08, 12:51
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Josh Brown is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Oklahoma City, OK Posts: 11 | Re: Chrysler going green? I don't post to often but I'll put in my thoughts because it's an important topic...
Automakers should choose a common fuel and work together to further research into that field. Personally, I don't think car makers should vary into the different subfields such as biodiesel or ethanol. Ironically, it'll create a temporary stalemate of too many independent fuel choices ultimately shaving years off necessary research of a long-term fuel solution.
Either 100% electric or my favorite, Hydrogen. Anything else is spinning our wheels...
Sorry, I like this subject...feel free to disagree (honestly!),
Josh Brown
__________________
Josh Brown
2006 Lexus IS350
| |
| |
02-27-08, 02:25
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Mark77 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Helsinki, Finland Posts: 602 | Re: Chrysler going green? Josh Brown, have you heard of methanol as a fuel instead of ethanol? I read about it and it seems to make more sense to me. Can be made from wood instead of food(corn). I just wonder why no one really talks about it? | |
| |
02-27-08, 05:30
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Registered User
jswift2000 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Monroe, CT Posts: 369 | Re: Chrysler going green? Hydrogen is a clean fuel but the energy required to make hydrogen isn't very green. I agree bio fuel is the way to go and that car companies should work together to develop the next fuel. Too bad the govt isn't more concerned. I her carb is trying to push 44 mpg by 2020. That would be great but it may already be too late. | |
| |
02-27-08, 09:09
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Morris9982 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 31 | Re: Chrysler going green? Part of the reason car makers are producing flex-fuel type vehicles are that they get CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) credits for those vehicles.
My understanding is that the fleet average fuel economy has to meet a certain minimum (I can't remember the number right now). If they sell a flex-fuel vehicle, they get to use a higher mileage number for that vehicle, even though it will probably get less mileage using something like E-85 fuel.
The credits they get for selling flex-fuel vehicles increases their CAFE calculations and prevent them from having to pay fines. That leaves them free to sell more low mileage/higher profit vehicles, like pick up trucks and large SUV's.
Maybe that is why they are starting to switch. GM has been doing this for a while and all the car magazines seem to think the only reason is the CAFE numbers. Most people that buy the flex-fuel vehicles continue to use gas because E-85 is just not available. | |
| |
02-27-08, 09:19
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Registered User
sspeer is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: IL Posts: 586 | Re: Chrysler going green? Methanol's big hangup is that it's toxic (not that I'd be drinking gasoline)
I don't think E85 is worthwhile long term unless they can make it in large quantities from biomass instead of corn..which is good for farmers, but is really driving up prices in the food market..everything from eggs to milk to meat
I don't like that the government is really pushing Ethanol (can you say special interests and pandering instead of long term sustainability?)..I'd rather see incentives for 'non gasoline' and let the best solution win | |
| |
02-27-08, 11:32
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Registered User
WhenISayJump is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 27 | Re: Chrysler going green? Quote: |
Originally Posted by jswift2000 | sounds like everyone is doing it. There even having a certified Chrysler green Dealership that is currently under construction in Florida, which they are spending 3 billiion in new fuel efficiency and technology.
a.k.a. Patrick you said you have a flex fuel vehicles how do you like or do you even use the E85 | |
| |
02-27-08, 08:41
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Registered User
paul34 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Orlando, FL (UCF) Posts: 1,148 | Re: Chrysler going green? Quote: |
Originally Posted by sspeer Methanol's big hangup is that it's toxic (not that I'd be drinking gasoline)
I don't think E85 is worthwhile long term unless they can make it in large quantities from biomass instead of corn..which is good for farmers, but is really driving up prices in the food market..everything from eggs to milk to meat
I don't like that the government is really pushing Ethanol (can you say special interests and pandering instead of long term sustainability?)..I'd rather see incentives for 'non gasoline' and let the best solution win | Not to mention the clearing of forests to grow fields of corn or switchgrass or whatever... I'd rather have a forest and oil drill than a large, fertilized field with lots of diesel machines and few large trees.
I think people lose sight of the big picture when it comes to the whole alternative fuels craze.
__________________
ONR = Optimum No Rinse
| |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:32. | | | |