Welcome to Autopia.org.
You are viewing as a guest.
By joining our FREE community you will be able to interact with others. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today. When you join, this box is replaced with our live chat!
|
11-02-09, 06:50
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Cincinnati Car Detailing
tssdetailing is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 113
Contact:
|
Optimum No Rinse: Field test
My Car hadn't been washed in about a month. I had done 2 auto crossing races and driven it on the highway/parked in dusty *** downtown during construction-you can see she's filthy. I would consider ONR like a really indepth "quick detailer." My only upset is it didn't take off a little of the tape transfer above my fender (from adhering racing numbers to the car). It also takes FOREVER. Like almost 1.5 hours....lots of moving around, quite the work out!
Before: lots of dust alll over the car, look at the products reflection on wing and above the door handle for most obvious changes.

After-deep and glossy, THIS IS NOT WAXED

Glamour shot-see the reflection? Not a scratch in the paint.
All in All I give the product a high B+ like an 89.999%. Just not quite an A. I would definately use it again, but would be skeptical on a clients car or on something truley filthy, maybe until I got confortable with it.
__________________
|
|
|
|
11-02-09, 07:42
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Now with twice the head
Scottwax is offline
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 27,405
Contact:
|
Re: Optimum No Rinse: Field test
Once you get the hang of it, you should be able to wash your car in 30 minutes or less. Just takes a couple uses to really get the process down.
|
|
|
|
11-02-09, 07:46
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
seech is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 47
|
Re: Optimum No Rinse: Field test
I started using ONR after all the good reviews by Scottwax. When I first started using it, it seemed to take forever but now its much faster. Love it! Thanks Scottwax!
|
|
|
|
11-02-09, 07:53
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
toyotaguy is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: orange county, ca
Posts: 3,277
|
Re: Optimum No Rinse: Field test
yeah, my timing went from 45min to 25 min once I got more comfortable...now I use it on every car I do without a full paint correction! For those, its chemical guys wash and clear
__________________
enviousdetailing - When quality matters!
*now offering PDR, window tinting, bumper repair and repaint!*
|
|
|
|
11-02-09, 07:59
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Krafcik is offline
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 92
|
Re: Optimum No Rinse: Field test
Also goes much faster if their is a good wax on the car - really speeds up the sheeting.
__________________
And the light shineth through the darkness
|
|
|
|
11-02-09, 08:06
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Leadfootluke is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Grand Rapids
Posts: 144
|
Re: Optimum No Rinse: Field test
Very nice.
Looking to get on the ONR bandwagon as well.
What dilution did you use?
|
|
|
|
11-02-09, 08:30
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Now with twice the head
Scottwax is offline
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 27,405
Contact:
|
Re: Optimum No Rinse: Field test
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leadfootluke
Very nice.
Looking to get on the ONR bandwagon as well.
What dilution did you use?
|
1 oz per 2 gallons of water. There is no advantage (unless you count increased sales for Optimum  ) to using more product than that to wash.
|
|
|
|
11-02-09, 08:36
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Leadfootluke is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Grand Rapids
Posts: 144
|
Re: Optimum No Rinse: Field test
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottwax
1 oz per 2 gallons of water. There is no advantage (unless you count increased sales for Optimum  ) to using more product than that to wash.
|
I only questioned it because he said: I would consider ONR like a really indepth "quick detailer."
And as a quick detailer, the dilution is different 
|
|
|
|
11-02-09, 08:57
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Cincinnati Car Detailing
tssdetailing is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 113
Contact:
|
Re: Optimum No Rinse: Field test
I used 1 oz to 1 gallon-per recommendations of the bottle. I believe they say for a QD it's 1oz to 2 and for a Clay lube its 2oz to 1 gal. But, I stand by saying its an in-depth quick detailer b/c (and it might be b/c i'm new with it) I jus don't feel it's getting all the crevices and body molding like a blast of water from the hose would. There's a bit of confidence that seems to be missing there.
__________________
|
|
|
|
11-03-09, 07:50
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
yakky is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NoVA
Posts: 1,523
|
Re: Optimum No Rinse: Field test
Like others have mentioned, it gets much faster when you build confidence in the product. I'm down to using one bucket (sometimes for 2 cars!!!!) and I don't dry each panel, I usually dry each side of the car. I like using white waffle weaves for drying as it show
|
|
|
|
11-03-09, 08:01
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
rad21 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Toluca Lake, CA
Posts: 449
|
Re: Optimum No Rinse: Field test
Quote:
Originally Posted by tssdetailing
I used 1 oz to 1 gallon-per recommendations of the bottle. I believe they say for a QD it's 1oz to 2 and for a Clay lube its 2oz to 1 gal. But, I stand by saying its an in-depth quick detailer b/c (and it might be b/c i'm new with it) I jus don't feel it's getting all the crevices and body molding like a blast of water from the hose would. There's a bit of confidence that seems to be missing there.
|
I jus don't feel it's getting all the crevices and body molding like a blast of water from the hose would.
I have to agree with you on this. The crevices around the doors, hood, trunk, headlamps, foglights, gas door etc still show areas that aren't 100% clean when using ONR and it takes extra time to wipe these hard to get areas that are easily rinsed clean with a traditional hand wash with soap. That's why I alternate ONR and traditional washes every other week.
__________________
2006 BMW 330i Alpine White PP, Nav, CWP, PRS, Menzerna Nano Polish, Prima Epic, Optimum Opti-seal
|
|
|
|
11-03-09, 08:12
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
yakky is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NoVA
Posts: 1,523
|
Re: Optimum No Rinse: Field test
Quote:
Originally Posted by rad21
I jus don't feel it's getting all the crevices and body molding like a blast of water from the hose would.
I have to agree with you on this. The crevices around the doors, hood, trunk, headlamps, foglights, gas door etc still show areas that aren't 100% clean when using ONR and it takes extra time to wipe these hard to get areas that are easily rinsed clean with a traditional hand wash with soap. That's why I alternate ONR and traditional washes every other week.
|
Use a sheepskin mit or one of the microfiber sponges that have a lot of nap and they will get those spots just fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:25. |
|
|
|