Autopia Car Detailing Forum Home
Autopia Car Detailing How-To Articles Autopia Car Detailing Product Reviews Autopia Car Detailing Products & Supplies Catalog
Go Back   Autopia.org > CAR DETAILING & FINISH CARE > Car Detailing Product Discussion


Welcome to the Autopia.org. You are viewing as a guest.  By joining our FREE community you will be able to interact with others.  Plus, when you join you will receive instant coupon codes for special discounts with our sponsors.  Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

Autopia Marketplace

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes

Old 04-26-06, 07:28   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
ActionPack's Avatar
 
ActionPack is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 35
ActionPack is on a distinguished road
PC7424, Difference in using a 5'' backing plate versus a 6''

I have been using a 6'' B&D random orbit polisher to do most out my buffing for the last 3 years. However as my skills are getting better (i still have alot to learn and thanks to all for the great info they share on this site) i definetly outgrew this buffer. Its not strong enough to remove deep swirls and buff scratches deeper than surface and most important its only 1 speed . The PC7424 is to me the next step prior to a rotary which at this point i think i would do more harm than good with.

Here is my dilemma, there are 2 kits which i am looking right now:
1. The PC7424 (Porter Cable Swirl Buster kit) kit from Eshine.ca with a 5'' backing plate and 3 6.5'' pads.
or
2. PC7424 (Sonus SFX Polisher Kit) kit from Autopia-Car care which comes with a 6'' backing plate with 3 6'' pads.

What is the difference in using a 6'' backplate versus a 5'' one? Will the 5'' allow more flexing of the pads? Are bigger pads better than smaller ones? and if i want to use the MF polishing bonnets i have used on my B&D will they fit on the 6'' backing plate?

Please help
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-06, 07:32   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
RCBuddha's Avatar
 
RCBuddha is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,458
RCBuddha is on a distinguished road
http://meguiarsonline.com/forums/sho...=backing+plate

I'm sure someone else can chime in on the difference in pad sizes.
__________________
Proud Member of:
Club HITACHI, PC, Cyclo & MENZERNA

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-06, 07:43   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
ActionPack's Avatar
 
ActionPack is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 35
ActionPack is on a distinguished road
Thanks, RCBuddha. The meguiar thread talks alot about effects or non-effects of the counterwieghts. For the same counterwight does it make a huge difference using a smaller or bigger backing plate?
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-06, 07:57   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
RCBuddha's Avatar
 
RCBuddha is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,458
RCBuddha is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ActionPack
Thanks, RCBuddha. The meguiar thread talks alot about effects or non-effects of the counterwieghts. For the same counterwight does it make a huge difference using a smaller or bigger backing plate?
Good question, and one that I cannot offer conclusive experience on (though I have experimented a little bit). In theory, if you were to use a 6" backing plate on a 6.5" pad, you should be able to apply more pressure to the pad, then say a 5" plate on the same pad. Again, in theory, being able to apply pressure over a wider area *should* make for better defect removal. Does that make sense?

I hate to talk in hypotheticals, so maybe someone else can chime in with hands-on experience.
__________________
Proud Member of:
Club HITACHI, PC, Cyclo & MENZERNA

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-06, 04:36   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
eShine is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada eh?
Posts: 383
eShine is on a distinguished road
I have used both the 6" backing plate and the 5". I find the 5" allows better flex of the pad edge allowing the pad to flex more in curved areas. I also experienced higher vibrations on speed 6 using the larger/heavier 6" backing plate.
__________________
Chris Pace,
eShine Canada
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-06, 10:11   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
roadwarriorUK's Avatar
 
roadwarriorUK is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 43
roadwarriorUK is on a distinguished road
1"
__________________
Honda Civic 1.6 VTEC S
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-06, 01:25   #7 (permalink)
Practical Perfectionist
 
Accumulator is offline
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 20,766
Accumulator will become famous soon enough Accumulator will become famous soon enough
The potential problem with the smaller backing plate is that when pressure is applied it can cut into the back of the pad, usually referred to as a "cookie cutter" type of effect. I've never had any other problems from using a smaller plate with a bigger pad, no uneven polishing or anything like that.

I've used both size plates and never had any big issues either way.

While some don't notice any difference between the two counterweights, I find the best combo to be the biggest weight with the lightest plate/pad combo.

For 6-6.5" pads I prefer the "flex" backing plate which is IIRC a bit smaller than 6". For major correction I use the small backing plate (3.75" IIRC) with 4" pads. With *any* plate/pad I use the 6" counterweight.

Backing plates and counterweights are inexpensive and easily changed. Not a biggie which ones you start out with, I've used a scad of different ones over the years and if you experiment you'll find the combo you like best.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-06, 02:33   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
eShine is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada eh?
Posts: 383
eShine is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Accumulator
The potential problem with the smaller backing plate is that when pressure is applied it can cut into the back of the pad, usually referred to as a "cookie cutter" type of effect. I've never had any other problems from using a smaller plate with a bigger pad, no uneven polishing or anything like that.

I've used both size plates and never had any big issues either way.

While some don't notice any difference between the two counterweights, I find the best combo to be the biggest weight with the lightest plate/pad combo.

For 6-6.5" pads I prefer the "flex" backing plate which is IIRC a bit smaller than 6". For major correction I use the small backing plate (3.75" IIRC) with 4" pads. With *any* plate/pad I use the 6" counterweight.

Backing plates and counterweights are inexpensive and easily changed. Not a biggie which ones you start out with, I've used a scad of different ones over the years and if you experiment you'll find the combo you like best.
This was especially true when the pad designs were only using 5" of velcro. The revised design makes it very tough to cut through the velcro. It was very frustrating before the design change, we had many returns!
__________________
Chris Pace,
eShine Canada
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-27-06, 02:44   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
ActionPack's Avatar
 
ActionPack is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 35
ActionPack is on a distinguished road
Thanks all for the info. Its really appreciated.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:53.


Copyright (c), 1999-2008, Autopia.org - All Rights Reserved

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79