View Single Post

Old 04-19-07, 06:52   #55 (permalink)
01bluecls
Sir-Wax-A-Lot
 
01bluecls's Avatar
 
01bluecls is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 2,162
Re: Menzerna's New 106FA (pic)

Im not saying a PC cannot correct. Im saying cleanyourcars post just doesnt add up. Why is the Makita right next to the car in the pic?? I also use Menzerna and have used Powergloss, IP, FPII, and 106FF. I have used Optimum polishes and have all three. I have used the PC and the Rotary. I have polished ultra soft paint that would marr wiping an LSP off with a clean high quality mf with nothing caught in the mf. I also use the least agreesive method when approaching paint, but since Im familiar with a lot of different paints I tend to know what corrections will be needed with what paints to some degree.

Why did I post all that? I safely say my experience in detailing tells me that something is wrong with his story. DaveKG im not attacking your comments. I just would like more "proof" of a polishing pad and this 106FA pulling results like this on other vehicles and from other detailers.


I would like people to post pics of the SAME level of defects cleanyourcar's pics has and show me afters of results from a final polish and polishing pad by PC. I can go through 100 of threads where cutting pads and more aggressive polishes were used that didnt produce the 50/50 shots you see.

Maybe i'm over reacting a little, but until things are proven, in my eyes credibility is hard to perceive in cleanyourcar's thread.
__________________
Refined Detailing
Chris - Sole Proprietor
  Reply With Quote