Autopia.org - View Single Post

TheMummyman · 05-05-09, 05:01

I could care less about the Pittman products, it's obvious you guys would never use them anyway. I've never used them either.

Bottom line is the moderator shouldn't threaten bans because someone disagrees with if a post is spam, or an actual person who used the product. Merely tell the person it's suspected spam and case closed. Don't threaten a ban unless they change their "tude". I could care less about the Pittman poster, as I think it was BS, but for the guy who spoke up who disagreed? Nobody thinks that is a shred inappropriate to ban him?

05-05-09, 05:01	#47 (permalink)
TheMummyman Registered User TheMummyman is offline Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 9	Re: Pittman's VaporWax! (warning) I could care less about the Pittman products, it's obvious you guys would never use them anyway. I've never used them either. Bottom line is the moderator shouldn't threaten bans because someone disagrees with if a post is spam, or an actual person who used the product. Merely tell the person it's suspected spam and case closed. Don't threaten a ban unless they change their "tude". I could care less about the Pittman poster, as I think it was BS, but for the guy who spoke up who disagreed? Nobody thinks that is a shred inappropriate to ban him?