Autopia.org - View Single Post - City Requires Mobile Detailers to Capture Run Off!

Dsoto87 · 04-10-09, 09:17

Your still preaching to the wrong crowd. 95% of the "detailers" here are not volume car washers.

You say its like trying to teach a pig to sing. Your right. You should be trying to teach another animal.

I think everyone here understands where your coming from and how it benefits those in your industry. Now understand us. The washing part where runoff can possibly be an issue is a very very small percentage of what we actually do. When someone is washing 10 cars a day, that's when it becomes an issue. But if someone is spending a day or more on 1 car, do you know how little of that time is actually spent using water? Many detailers here have already switched to rinseless washing. The runoff with that is minimal.

You really need to find another forum. As I said, look for one that specializes in volume work, not detailing.

Your opinion is welcome here ofcourse, but you've gone beyond opinion now.

04-10-09, 09:17	#51 (permalink)
Dsoto87 DWG/UPGP/DWG Dsoto87 is offline Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: San Francisco Posts: 856	Re: City Requires Mobile Detailers to Capture Run Off! Your still preaching to the wrong crowd. 95% of the "detailers" here are not volume car washers. You say its like trying to teach a pig to sing. Your right. You should be trying to teach another animal. I think everyone here understands where your coming from and how it benefits those in your industry. Now understand us. The washing part where runoff can possibly be an issue is a very very small percentage of what we actually do. When someone is washing 10 cars a day, that's when it becomes an issue. But if someone is spending a day or more on 1 car, do you know how little of that time is actually spent using water? Many detailers here have already switched to rinseless washing. The runoff with that is minimal. You really need to find another forum. As I said, look for one that specializes in volume work, not detailing. Your opinion is welcome here ofcourse, but you've gone beyond opinion now.