View Single Post

Old 11-14-08, 11:19   #64 (permalink)
Len_A
Outta Work In Detroit
 
Len_A's Avatar
 
Len_A is offline
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Westland, MI (Detroit suburb)
Posts: 678
Contact: Send a message via AIM to Len_A
Re: Should the government bail-out include domestic automakers?

Automotive News

AUTOMOTIVE NEWS EDITORIAL

The cost of GM's death


Automotive News | November 14, 2008 - 12:28 pm EST

If Congress thinks a bailout of General Motors is expensive, it should consider the cost of a GM failure.
Let’s be clear. The alternative to government cash for GM is not a dreamy Chapter 11 filing, a reorganization that puts dealers and the UAW
in their place, ensuring future success.
No, even if GM could get debtor-in-possession financing to keep the lights on (which it can’t), Chapter 11 means a collapse of sales and a
spiral into a Chapter 7 liquidation.
GM’s 100,000 American jobs will die. Health care for a million Americans will be lost or at risk. Hundreds of GM’s 1,300 suppliers will die.
Their collapse could take down Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC, perhaps even North American transplants. Dealers in every county of
America will close.
The government will face greater unemployment, more Americans without health insurance and greater pension liabilities.
Criticize Detroit 3 executives all you want. But the issue today is not whether GM should have closed Buick years ago, been tougher with the
UAW or supported higher fuel economy standards.
In the next two to four months, GM will run out of cash and turn out the lights. Only government money can prevent that. Every other
alternative is fantasy.
The $25 billion in loans that Congress approved to partially fund improvements in fuel economy? Irrelevant. Dead automakers do not invest
in technology.
The collapse of the global financial system has crushed the American car market, dried up revenues for the Detroit 3 and highlighted their
weaknesses.
Each of the Detroit 3 is in crisis. But Ford, which borrowed big two years ago and thus has more cash today, may skip a bailout and the strings
attached. Cerberus, which bought Chrysler last year, doesn’t deserve money. Government cash might help sell Chrysler to a strategic owner.
Some Detroit critics want their pound of flesh: Throw the bums out and install a government czar. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson won’t
use any of his $700 billion bank bailout money to help manufacturers. In any case, he’d need a guarantee that a bailout would make Detroit
“viable.”
Well, nobody -- not even AIG -- is insuring guarantees for viability.
The taxpayer needs protection and an upside. GM’s top management may need to go. Government-as-shareholder deserves a big voice.
Those details can be worked out.
The Detroit 3 CEOs and UAW President Ron Gettelfinger had better tell two critical congressional hearings next week what sacrifices they are
prepared to make.
But the stark fact remains: Absent a bailout, GM dies, and with it much of manufacturing in America. Congress needs to do the right thing --
now.

Automotive News Automotive News -- In-depth coverage of the automotive industry with special features for subscribers...
2 of 2 11/14/2008 1:40 PM
PRINTED FROM:
http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dl...plate=printart
Entire contents ©2008 Crain Communications, Inc.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Outside Sales, Out of work over a year and counting...
  Reply With Quote