Quote:
Originally Posted by howareb  After a quick glance at your situation, I disagree that you need separate physical infrastructure for two separate subnets and actually I am quite surprise that Cisco told you this.
Is any of your equipment capable of doing port based VLANs, because this would allow you to do what you need (If I am understanding correctly what you want). |
howarweb: the ASA5505 (top of the pyramid) does 3 VLANs. It's currently doing 2, outside and inside. I can add another one.
One of my biggest problems with this is even though port 1 is 10.x and port 2 is 172.x, because some of the offices are mixed between subnets but share common wiring back to the closet.. I cannot simply take computer 2,3,8 and 9 and plug them into a switch that is uplinked to a designated VLAN port.